Stablecoin Policy Progress Impeded by Partisan Disagreements

Democrats slammed the current Republican-led draft bill for stablecoin legislation, but the parties agree on some points

article-image

Source: Shutterstock / Andrea Izzotti, modified by Blockworks

share

A draft of the long-awaited bipartisan stablecoin legislation Congress members have been promising hit the wire last week, but top Democrats say the bill is nothing like what was discussed. 

House Representatives met last week to discuss stablecoins and hear from expert witnesses about their role, safety and stability. The current draft bill was released by Republicans on the Subcommittee on Digital Assets ahead of the hearing. 

Subcommittee Chair Rep. French Hill (R-Ark.) hailed the legislation as a bipartisan effort that began last fall. 

But Democrats beg to differ. The draft “in no way recommends the final work on stablecoins by negotiations between the two of us,” Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Cali.) said, referring to unresolved conversations with Hill. Democrats will have to “start from scratch,” she added. 

Hill responded by saying he welcomes collaboration on the bill and stablecoin framework.

As the hearing progressed, the party lines became more clear. Here is a rundown on where leaders stand when it comes to collaboration on stablecoin policy. 

Where cross aisle agreement can be found 

Several Subcommittee members brought up the collapse of TerraUSD and Luna and highlighted the need to protect investors and enforce strict reserve reporting requirements. 

Customer funds should also not be commingled, Republicans and Democrats agreed unequivocally. 

There also seems to be some bipartisan agreement that US Dollar dominance should not be undermined, by a stablecoin or otherwise, although there is some disagreement about how stablecoins may impact USD. 

House Republicans and Democrats may not agree on how to get there, but both sides of the aisle are calling for some sort of policy to make it through soon. 

Where party lines remain strong 

Some Democrats maintain the need for more guidelines around who can issue stablecoins. 

“These programs are typically limited to banks who are heavily regulated and that is for good reason,” Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) said. “It is the danger of allowing shadow banking products, particularly stablecoins, to issue deposits like products without FDIC insurance. So I strongly believe we need to separate crypto assets from our banking system, and this [draft] bill does just the opposite.”

Others in the party, like Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY), counter that stablecoin issuers are nothing like banks; if there are no lending services provided, there is no need to require issuers to be licensed banks. 

Lawmakers also disagreed about privacy and KYC policies around stablecoins. Rep. Bill Foster (D-Illi.) suggested regulators would need access to each wallet owner’s identity in order to effectively oversee the industry. 

Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) on the other hand, said private and permissionless blockchains are essential. 

Congress members also had a difficult time getting on the same page about state versus federal policy. Rep. Torres said he would not be inclined to support any legislation that undermined New York’s current stablecoin regulatory policy.

What’s next

Bipartisan talks between current Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee Patrick McHenry (R-NC), and Rep. Waters began last year, but the two were unable to move their efforts out of committee. 

Any bill will ultimately have to get through the Senate as well, and if Senate Banking Committee Chair Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), doesn’t take interest, the legislation will likely die. 

Crypto investment vehicles are “speculative products run by reckless companies — we know that’s true,” Sen. Brown said during a February hearing after the fallout of FTX.  

“It would require, certainly, a change in approach for the Banking Committee to move forward with markup,” Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) said, during an appearance in DC to discuss her bipartisan crypto bill

Rep. Waters has not yet released her own draft or proposal for a new stablecoin bill to counter what Republicans unveiled last week. The draft bill has also not yet been introduced on the House floor.


Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Salt Lake City, UT

WED - FRI, OCTOBER 9 - 11, 2024

Pack your bags, anon — we’re heading west! Join us in the beautiful Salt Lake City for the third installment of Permissionless. Come for the alpha, stay for the fresh air. Permissionless III promises unforgettable panels, killer networking opportunities, and mountains […]

recent research

Screen Shot 2024-05-16 at 14.53.45.png

Research

Loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR) is arguably Ethereum DeFi’s biggest problem, and thus reducing LVR is fundamental to the success of Ethereum. This report dives into the world of LVR. We uncover its importance for AMM designers, discuss the two major mechanism design categories and various projects developing solutions, and offer a higher level perspective on the importance of AMMs in general.

article-image

Yesterday saw Congress’ upper chamber side with the House on a measure aimed at overturning SAB 121

article-image

Oklahoma’s new crypto bill will go into effect in November of this year

article-image

The deposits hit a $20 million cap in just 45 minutes

article-image

Twelve Democratic Senators voted in favor to pass the resolution Thursday

article-image

Pump.fun is “aware” that bonding curve contracts on Pump.fun were exploited, and has since paused trading

article-image

Some investment pros are mulling crypto allocations between 1% and 10% and seeking ex-BTC exposure for interested clients