The IRS’ crypto tax guidance is a slow creep toward rationality

Their current stance is a half-baked attempt that could stifle innovation and burden an emerging industry

OPINION
article-image

Midjourney modified by Blockworks

share

In 2022, the crypto world was captivated by a lawsuit that wasn’t about Coinbase, Ripple or Grayscale. It was about Joshua and Jessica Jarrett, two Tennessee taxpayers who took on the IRS over Tezos tokens created through staking. Instead of choosing a position, the IRS demurred, sent a refund, and the case was dismissed. 

This left the crypto community, eager for regulatory guidance, in limbo. Fast forward to July 31, 2023, and the IRS has released new guidance on staking rewards. 

Spoiler alert: It’s a mess. 

The IRS’s new stance is inconsistent with current tax laws and burdens staking providers.

Why is this so complicated? 

Well, as with all things crypto, staking is anything but straightforward. At times, staking can feel like mining — you validate a few blocks, and suddenly, a coin is deposited into your wallet, ready for immediate use. That certainly feels like income. 

But more often than not, unlocking those staking rewards is a Herculean task. You might have to unstake your assets, wait out a period or even navigate a vesting schedule. In these cases, labeling it as “’instant income” is a tough sell.

The IRS’s misguided approach

The IRS has decided that staking rewards should be included in gross income the moment the taxpayer controls them. But remember, these revenue rulings aren’t law; they’re more like “strong suggestions.” 

The IRS’s opinion is just that — an opinion. And it’s one that courts, especially the Tax Court, don’t necessarily have to follow. So, before you start calculating how much you owe Uncle Sam for your staking rewards, remember that this isn’t set in stone.

The art of taxation: Why creating value isn’t the same as earning income

Tax law is like a Rubik’s Cube — complicated but solvable. The IRS’s broad definition of gross income comes with caveats. You’re not taxed for creating value; you’re taxed when that value is realized through a sale or exchange. This principle is rooted in case law and IRS rulings that have stood the test of time. 

For instance, if you’re an artist and you create a painting, you’re not taxed on the value of that painting when you finish it. You would be taxed on any income you earn from selling the painting. Wouldn’t the same hold true for digital assets? The IRS doesn’t think so.

Let’s delve into the IRS’s glaring omissions. The ruling is mum on whether tokens received from staking are “newly created property” for which the taxpayer is the original owner, which could land them in the bucket of nontaxable self-created property.

The ruling does make a passing mention that “validation rewards typically consist of newly created units of cryptocurrency.” However, this statement is conspicuously absent from the IRS’s core arguments. It’s like saying, “We know it, but we won’t admit it.”

The IRS also conveniently sidesteps key elements of landmark cases. Take the US Supreme Court case Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., which defines income as “undeniable accessions to wealth, clearly realized, and over which the taxpayers have complete dominion.” The IRS ruling acknowledges “accessions to wealth” and “complete dominion,” but is eerily silent on the “clearly realized” part.

Read more from our opinion section: Yes, crypto is ready for Wall Street

Moreover, the IRS disregards a century of case law supporting the non-taxability of self-created property. They can’t just ignore Supreme Court rulings like Eisner v. Macomber, which established that income isn’t taxable until realized, or Anschutz v. Commissioner, which reinforced that a taxable event occurs upon sale or exchange, not creation.

The unbearable weight of staking taxes

Locked rewards aren’t taxable until you can use them, but the IRS’s guidance would create an administrative nightmare and force stakers into financial gymnastics just to pay their tax bills. 

If you declare your staking rewards as immediate income, you’re cornered into unenviable choices: Liquidate your new tokens, compromising network security; halt some staking, reducing your holdings; divert other investment funds; or, heaven forbid, evade taxes (don’t do it). And let’s not forget the phantom income menace — owing taxes on tokens that have tanked in value by tax season. You could be taxed on “ghost money.”

A missed opportunity for the IRS

The IRS’s guidance leaves us with more questions than answers. From slashing penalties to the tax obligations of foreign stakers, the IRS has a lot more explaining to do. 

Should slashing penalties be considered ordinary losses if rewards are ordinary income? The IRS is tight-lipped. Do foreign stakers owe US income tax if they delegate staking to US nodes? Could this be considered a “US trade or business?” Will the standard 30% withholding tax apply to these foreign stakers? How will liquid staking assets like Lido’s stETH be treated? Many argue they should qualify for capital gains treatment. Until these questions are answered, the tax landscape for staking remains as clear as mud.

The IRS had a golden opportunity to craft nuanced regulations for this complex area of tax law. Instead, they’ve given us a one-size-fits-all approach that fits no one. This issue is far from settled and is likely headed for the courtroom unless Congress steps in. 

The IRS’s guidance is a half-baked attempt that could stifle innovation and burden an emerging industry. It’s time for a more thoughtful approach.



Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Salt Lake City, UT

WED - FRI, OCTOBER 9 - 11, 2024

Pack your bags, anon — we’re heading west! Join us in the beautiful Salt Lake City for the third installment of Permissionless. Come for the alpha, stay for the fresh air. Permissionless III promises unforgettable panels, killer networking opportunities, and mountains […]

recent research

Screen Shot 2024-05-16 at 14.53.45.png

Research

Loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR) is arguably Ethereum DeFi’s biggest problem, and thus reducing LVR is fundamental to the success of Ethereum. This report dives into the world of LVR. We uncover its importance for AMM designers, discuss the two major mechanism design categories and various projects developing solutions, and offer a higher level perspective on the importance of AMMs in general.

article-image

Yesterday saw Congress’ upper chamber side with the House on a measure aimed at overturning SAB 121

article-image

Oklahoma’s new crypto bill will go into effect in November of this year

article-image

The deposits hit a $20 million cap in just 45 minutes

article-image

Twelve Democratic Senators voted in favor to pass the resolution Thursday

article-image

Pump.fun is “aware” that bonding curve contracts on Pump.fun were exploited, and has since paused trading

article-image

Some investment pros are mulling crypto allocations between 1% and 10% and seeking ex-BTC exposure for interested clients