SEC Sues Dragonchain Over $16.5M ICO

Dragonchain is charged with violating the Securities Act of 1933


Gary Gensler, Chair, US Securities and Exchange Commission | Blockworks exclusive art by Axel Rangel


key takeaways

  • DRGN token dropped over 15% since the announcement
  • SEC is requesting Dragonchain return the $16.5 million with interest

The SEC is suing startup founder John Joseph Roets and three entities he controls — Dragonchain, the Dragonchain Foundation and The Dragon Company — for raising $16.5 million in unregistered cryptoasset securities offerings.

Open source blockchain Dragonchain was originally developed as Disney’s private blockchain platform in Seattle in 2016. The court filing, in the US District Court for the Western District of Washington, charges the defendants with violating the Securities Act of 1933.

The SEC claimed both the 2017 presale and the Initial Coin Offering (ICO) of Dragon tokens (DRGN) were unregistered crypto asset securities offerings that allegedly raised approximately $14 million from over 5,000 investors.

Another $2.5 million worth of DRGN was allegedly offered and sold between 2019 and 2022 “to cover business expenditures and market Dragonchain technology.”

The agency now demands disgorgement of the proceeds with prejudgment interest and a civil monetary penalty.

The altcoin has fallen sharply — roughly 15% after the announcement — $0.02 at the time of publication.

Loading Tweet..

DRGN has been under investigation by the SEC since 2018, and the company recently published a letter in response to the SEC’s recommendation to charge the aforementioned parties on April 27, 2022. 

Over the four-year-long dealings with the SEC, Roets’ argument wasn’t taken seriously, he wrote in the letter.

“We’ve never had an opportunity to present the case that the DRGN is a software license and utility token versus a financial security,” Roets said.

He added that the SEC is “picking and choosing projects to target…while giving a free pass to others.”

The company maintains that a DRGN is not a financial security and that during the sale of the DRGN software micro-license, purchasers who paid with bitcoin (BTC) or ether (ETH) directly acquired the utility token as opposed to making an investment.

The SEC has been ramping up its enforcement actions against purveyors of cryptoassets, a trend anticipated to continue.

Don’t miss the next big story – join our free daily newsletter.

Follow Sam Bankman-Fried’s trial with the latest news from the courtroom


Upcoming Events

MON - WED, MARCH 18 - 20, 2024

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will take place March 18-20, 2024 at The Hilton London Metropole. Why London? Momentum.  London has become one of the world’s hottest crypto hubs.  Innovation is thriving, new institutional investors are flocking in, and regulators like […]

recent research

l1 cover.png


This analysis focuses on financial metrics for general-purpose L1 blockchains. In many ways, L1s should be viewed as an entirely new asset class more comparable to digital economies than traditional businesses. L1s are the core infrastructure enabling the creation of new-age businesses like onchain protocols.


Polygon is transitioning to a validium-based system supported by zero-knowledge proofs


Indie filmmaker Sherone Rabinovitz has been gathering film of CryptoPunks’ founders and events for five years, and he just released the film’s trailer


The Cosmos MetaMask Snap is one of 36 Snaps currently in open beta


The ETF giant and crypto-native firm forged a partnership in 2021 before filing for a spot bitcoin ETF in June


Bloomberg Intelligence analysts expect ether futures ETFs by VanEck, Bitwise and ProShares to launch as soon as Monday


CommEX took over Binance’s operations in Russia this week after Binance left the country due to a mismatch with its compliance strategy