Crypto Fund Three Arrows Capital Facing Potential Insolvency: Report

After liquidations worth $400 million, Three Arrows Capital is reportedly working on an arrangement with lenders and other parties

article-image

Source: Shutterstock

share
  • Cofounder Zhu Su confirmed Three Arrows Capital is struggling, but didn’t address insolvency rumors
  • The firm drew attention on social media after blockchain data showed it selling its stETH positions

Recent on-chain data has triggered speculation that crypto trading and venture capital firm Three Arrows Capital (3AC) may be the latest prominent industry name to crumble.

Those indications were further fueled by a tweet on Tuesday from 3AC’s cofounder Zhu Su, who seemed to confirm a period of stress but didn’t drop specific details.

After what appears to be a $400-million liquidation by top-tier lenders, 3AC may now be facing insolvency, The Block reported on June 15, citing sources familiar. Since its liquidation, 3AC is said to have maintained limited contact with counterparties.

Loading Tweet..

The firm, which counts BlockFi and Deribit among its investments, is exploring how it can reclaim its position with lenders and other parties, the report added.

3AC didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment by Blockworks.

In traditional finance, liquidations happen when companies attempt to cover debts by selling some assets at a loss. In decentralized finance, a fund or protocol would sell crypto assets to cover its debt.

Founded in 2012 by classmates Zhu Su and Kyle Davies, 3AC is a well-known crypto hedge fund that has invested in multiple GameFi and DeFi projects. At market peak, it reportedly managed about $10 billion. In April, the fund pledged to move its headquarters from Singapore to Dubai. 

Three Arrows Capital takes haircut to pay back Aave loans

Due to its substantial investment in Terra, 3AC had already faced a major setback with the stablecoin’s collapse. 3AC also drew attention on social media after it began dumping its staked ether (stETH), which is down nearly 40% in the last week alone. 

The stETH token is meant to be redeemable for one ETH after Ethereum completes its transition to proof of stake. Due to current market volatility, stETH has fallen up to 7% below par with ETH, causing issues for some of its largest holders such as 3AC, as well as embattled crypto lender Celsius.

Notably, 3AC began withdrawing stETH from decentralized platforms in May during TerraUSD’s crash. More recently, the firm on Tuesday withdrew more than 81,000 stETH from interest-bearing DeFi protocol Aave — worth around $92 million at the time. 

Loading Tweet..

Shortly after, 3AC traded 38,900 stETH for 36,718 ETH (then worth $43.9 million) via decentralized exchange 0x, representing a 6% haircut on what should’ve been close to a one-to-one trade. 3AC then returned the ETH to Aave, as it was on loan.

In May, crypto bull Zhu said on Twitter that his supercycle price thesis was “regrettably wrong.” That thesis was laid out in an interview from February, when he suggested bitcoin could hit $2.5 million if it manages to capture a significant chunk of gold’s market share.

Along with stocks and other asset classes, the total market value of cryptocurrencies has fallen to $863 billion, according to Blockworks Research, down from $3 trillion in November.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 24 - 26, 2026

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Research Report Templates (27).png

Research

Solana's spot trading landscape will remain bifurcated: prop AMMs will own the short-tail of highly liquid pairs, while passive AMMs continue drifting toward the long-tail. Both can win via vertical integration, but in opposite directions: passive AMMs are moving closer to users through token issuance platforms (e.g., Pump-PumpSwap, MetaDAO-Futarchy AMM), while prop AMMs are moving down the stack into transaction landing services and infrastructure (e.g., HumidiFi-Nozomi). The venues most at risk are legacy AMMs with limited end-user control and no durable, launch-driven source of order flow.

article-image

Some systems improve by failing — and crypto has no choice

article-image

Yield Basis introduces an IL-free AMM design that already dominates BTC DEX liquidity

article-image

Maybe tokenholders don’t need the rights that corporate shareholders have come to expect

article-image

As Hyperliquid and Lighter battle for perps DEX dominance, Boros could capture the structural upside

article-image

Investors are often right about the future, but wrong about the returns

article-image

A look back at 2025, reflections on our industry, and what it means for Blockworks in 2026