Cosmos Hub contemplating legal hire following SEC probe

The proposal was prompted partly due to the SEC naming ATOM, Cosmos Hub’s native token, a security in the Binance lawsuit

article-image

Satheesh Sankaran/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks

share

Following the SEC’s decision to sue Binance and Coinbase, a proposal to hire a lawyer for the Cosmos Hub has been drafted as a potential precaution. 

The move was prompted, at least in part, by the SEC naming the Cosmos Hub’s native token ATOM as a security. 

In the draft proposal, a pseudonymous Cosmos community member RoboMcGobo noted the allegations in the Binance lawsuit could potentially have severe, and more broad, consequences.

“If any of the allegations in the Binance lawsuit require a threshold determination by the court that ATOM is a security, the court’s decision may have far-reaching impacts on the Cosmos Hub and, naturally, the ATOM token,” RoboMcGobo said.

If that kind of precedent pans out, the Cosmos Hub would not have much of an opportunity to mount its own defense. As a result, the thinking is that the Hub should consider hiring a lawyer or law firm able to provide legal advice in worst-case scenarios. 

“Having an attorney on standby for such an opportunity can only benefit us in ensuring that the Hub’s voice is heard in a case [that] could potentially decide its fate,” they said.

Cosmos community member Jacob Flowers said that although the SEC has not asked the court to prove ATOM or any of the other listed cryptocurrencies are securities, part of its case against Binance will be to prove that the centralized exchange had sold securities. 

“The SEC is going to have to prove that at least one of the cryptocurrencies that they list is a security,” Flowers said.

Although he does not believe the Hub itself may need to find a lawyer, the interchain foundation which was involved in the initial creation of ATOM could benefit from an evaluation from a securities attorney. 

Still, there were concerns that hiring a lawyer could bring forward centralization and regulatory concerns.

The concerns were fielded in short order by a community member that goes by the pseudonym Lil_D, who noted that although legal reviews and attorneys are inefficient, they also bring forward security for projects. 

“It weakens the value proposition of $ATOM and the Hub to be exposed to potential enforcement actions, far more than the potential value accrual of “moving fast and breaking things,” they said.

The proposal is currently in its draft stages and has not been put up for a community vote.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 24 - 26, 2026

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Research Report Templates (3).png

Research

South Korea is emerging as one of the most important global hubs for regulated digital assets, and Upbit sits at the center of this shift. Naver’s proposed acquisition could create the country’s dominant super app for payments, trading, and digital finance. This report breaks down the numbers, the regulatory tailwinds, the economics of the deal, and why the merger may unlock one of the most attractive asymmetries in Korea’s public markets.

article-image

Lido unveils a new buyback plan while BTC treasury companies slip below mNAV — can either model can truly return value?

article-image

If financial nihilism has driven you into memecoins, zero-day options, and sports betting, consider financial optimism instead

article-image

A new Sui-based protocol promises to unlock Bitcoin’s idle liquidity and eliminate wrapped-token risk

article-image

Could blockchain rails finally realize Ted Nelson’s non-linear, pro-creator “docuverse”?

article-image

What does Uniswap’s proposal to activate protocol fees and unify incentives mean for UNI token holders?

article-image

A recent mistrial illustrates how juries need more background information when it comes to judging complex systems like Ethereum