Crypto, Regulatory Oversight Both Culpable in Signature’s Collapse, FDIC Chair Admits

The chair acknowledged his agency’s shortcomings in acting sooner to curb the crisis spreading throughout Signature’s operations

article-image

FDIC Chair Martin Gruenberg | Source: The Center for American Progress Action Fund (CC license)

share

The collapse of Signature Bank was largely due to its reliance on uninsured deposits and exposure to crypto, FDIC Chair Martin Gruenberg said Monday.

In a speech before the House Committee on Financial Services, Gruenberg said Signature’s failure to manage its “reckless growth strategy” and inadequate risk management practices contributed significantly to its downfall.

The chair acknowledged his agency’s shortcomings in acting sooner to curb the crisis spreading throughout Signature’s operations. But Gruenberg only partially accepted blame.

He said: “Although fallout from the liquidation of Silvergate and the failure of Silicon Valley Bank was unprecedented and unfolded rapidly, Signature Bank’s poor governance and inadequate risk management practices put the bank in a position where it could not effectively manage its liquidity in a time of stress, making it unable to meet very large withdrawal requests.”

Signature Bank serviced a raft of big players in the crypto industry leading up to its demise, processing fast, round-the-clock payments between member customers, including stablecoin issuer Circle and crypto exchange Kraken. 

The FDIC’s oversight of Signature Bank had already been scrutinized, Gruenberg noted, pointing to a report by his agency’s Chief Risk Officer Marshall Gentry in late April.

Specifically, the report highlighted it would have been wise in late 2021 to reduce the bank’s management component rating to indicate need for improvement.

“Doing so would have been consistent with the FDIC’s forward-looking supervision concept, likely lowering Signature Bank’s Composite rating, and supporting consideration of an enforcement action,” he said.

Shocks across several crypto-friendly US banks over the past six months were precipitated by considerable headwinds for the crypto industry, most prominently the FTX implosion in November. 

Associated contagion has highlighted the potential systemic risk that crypto-linked banking activities pose, Gruenberg said.

Gruenberg’s comments align with previous statements from his agency in March which claimed that while Signature Bank maintained a more varied deposit base, it was fears related to the crypto market that ultimately instigated the bank run.

That was later questioned by the New York State Department of Financial Services. The department pointed out in a report that Silvergate’s liquidity position was insufficient, and that the bank had self-reported misleading data concerning its solvency.

“Additionally, [Signature] failed to understand the risk of its association with and reliance on, crypto industry deposits or its vulnerability to contagion from crypto industry turmoil that occurred in late 2022 and into 2023,” Gruenberg said.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

  • Blockworks Daily: The newsletter that helps thousands of investors understand crypto and the markets, by Byron Gilliam.
  • Empire: Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross.
  • Forward Guidance: Explore the growing intersection between crypto, macroeconomics, policy and finance with Ben Strack, Casey Wagner and Felix Jauvin.
  • 0xResearch: Get alpha directly in your inbox — market highlights, charts, degen trade ideas, governance updates, and more.
  • Lightspeed: All things Solana, in your inbox, every day from Jack Kubinec and Jeff Albus.
  • The Drop: The newsletter for crypto collectors and traders, covering games, tokens, apps, memes and more.
Tags

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 18 - 20, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

Industry City | Brooklyn, NY

TUES - THURS, JUNE 24 - 26, 2025

Permissionless IV serves as the definitive gathering for crypto’s technical founders, developers, and builders to come together and create the future.If you’re ready to shape the future of crypto, Permissionless IV is where it happens.

Old Billingsgate

Mon - Wed, October 13 - 15, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Unlocked by Template (4).png

Research

Wormhole Settlement allows for a highly scalable liquidity venue to fill user intents into a multichain, multi-VM future. By concentrating solvers’ balance sheets on Solana, transaction costs associated with solvers rebalancing inventory across destinations are eliminated. With the ability to settle bridging, swapping, and arbitrary interactions, without the costs and frictions of fragmenting solver liquidity, Wormhole Settlement has the opportunity to settle a large share of volumes in the crosschain interoperability market with a beneficial framework for both users and solvers. 

article-image

Sovereign states aren’t coming — they’re already here

article-image

Dinocoins like XRP and ADA are getting more attention, and it’s not just because of President Trump

article-image

Anthony Pompliano looks for folks who are running away from something rather than towards it

article-image

The Solana world has worked itself into a frenzy over SIMD-0228

article-image

Industry watchers weigh in on Trump’s Thursday night executive order

article-image

The new game lets you embark on quests, collect loot and socialize