Ripple takes notice of South Korea, looks to boost XRPL adoption

The company behind the cryptocurrency XRP and the XRP ledger is partnering with a local research firm to shore up its footing in South Korea

article-image

JUN3/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks

share

Ripple continues to look for opportunities to scale up its business and bring its services to new countries after emerging partially victorious from its years-long legal battle with the SEC.

South Korea is Ripple’s latest gambit. The company said on Tuesday that it will be partnering with Seoul-based firm Catalyze Research to bolster awareness of XRP Ledger (XRPL).

Three engineers founded Ripple, launching XRPL in June 2012 as a peer-to-peer blockchain. The network had 116 active validators as of July 27.

Ripple and Catalyze Research will be developing an XRPL education program for developers. The pair will also be hosting workshops, meetups and hackathons to help integrate decentralized applications (dApps) on the XRPL platform, according to a statement. 

Ripple told Blockworks it’s been working with Catalyze Research for about a year and described the firm as “scrappy.” Ripple added that its blockchain analysis team is plugged into the Web3 ecosystem and has a lot of experience with chains such as Avalanche and Tezos, making them natural partners in a play to boost developer participation on XRPL.

Markus Infanger, a Ripple vice president, called South Korea a “dynamic market” and praised the country’s developers. 

“South Korea has emerged as a vibrant hub for blockchain and Web3 technology, with a strong developer community that has showcased remarkable innovation and expertise,” Infanger said in a statement.

Read more: Ripple’s next stop: Service expansion in UK, Ireland

South Korea has booked a number of instances of elevated XRP trading volumes, compared to other nations. Ripple denied the partnership stemmed from those volumes. 

From January to May, XRP was the most highly traded cryptocurrency on South Korean crypto exchanges aside from bitcoin (BTC).

Over the same period, trading volumes for XRP, which totaled to $24.5 billion, nearly tripled that of ether (ETH), which sat at around $9 billion.


Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

Explore the growing intersection between crypto, macroeconomics, policy and finance with Ben Strack, Casey Wagner and Felix Jauvin. Subscribe to the Forward Guidance newsletter.

Get alpha directly in your inbox with the 0xResearch newsletter — market highlights, charts, degen trade ideas, governance updates, and more.

The Lightspeed newsletter is all things Solana, in your inbox, every day. Subscribe to daily Solana news from Jack Kubinec and Jeff Albus.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 18 - 20, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

Brooklyn, NY

TUES - THURS, JUNE 24 - 26, 2025

Permissionless IV serves as the definitive gathering for crypto’s technical founders, developers, and builders to come together and create the future.If you’re ready to shape the future of crypto, Permissionless IV is where it happens.

recent research

Research Report Templates.png

Research

An overview of the Base Ecosystem, with a focus on market leaders.

article-image

Although bitcoin hitting $120k by year’s end is looking unlikely

article-image

About 270 million HYPE has been claimed, valued around $7.6 billion

article-image

Stanford professors David Mazières and Dan Boneh will lead the lab alongside a cohort of graduate student researchers

article-image

With more companies holding BTC, bitcoin yielding strategies could become “a new corporate finance norm,” CoinShares posed

article-image

The proposal comes after Polygon governance considered a controversial use of bridged liquidity for yield

article-image

Can the community balance its decentralized ethos with the need for inclusivity and constructive debate?