South Korean lawmaker survives ouster over crypto scandal

Kim, who resigned from the Minjoo Party in May to become an independent, has been at the center of a scandal involving his ownership of approximately 800,000 Wemix tokens


sayan uranan/Shutterstock, modified by Blockworks


A proposal to remove South Korean legislator Kim Nam-kuk from the National Assembly, due to questionable crypto transactions, was rejected Wednesday.

The divide occurred along party lines, with members from the ruling People Power Party and the main opposition Democratic Party failing to reach a consensus. 

A parliamentary ethics subcommittee split 3-3 on the motion, falling short of the majority required for expulsion, according to local media reports.

Kim, who resigned from the Minjoo Party in May to become an independent, has been at the center of a scandal involving his ownership of approximately 800,000 WEMIX tokens, which were valued at around 6 billion South Korean won ($4.5 million) in 2021. 

The ownership raised suspicions of potential insider trading, further fuelled by reports that Kim actively traded cryptocurrencies during legislative meetings.

The independent’s actions prompted an internal investigation by the Democratic Party in May, which subsequently forced him to liquidate his tokens, Blockworks previously reported.

Days later, Korean officials carried out investigations into local crypto exchanges, including raids on Upbit and Bithumb, where Kim is alleged to have maintained his digital wallets.

It’s alleged Kim may have withdrawn his holdings prior to South Korea’s travel rule, which came into effect in March 2022, mandating the flagging of crypto transfers exceeding 1 million won (approximately $757).

His scandal also led to the passage of the “Kim Nam-kuk Prevention Act,” requiring lawmakers to disclose their digital asset holdings in a bid to boost the transparency of holdings by South Korean lawmakers. 

Additional attention has been drawn to his co-sponsorship of a 2021 bill aimed at delaying cryptocurrency taxation, which came months before he reportedly sold his WEMIX tokens. Kim has publicly refuted these claims and has publicly said he intends to sue media companies for false reporting.

Don’t miss the next big story – join our free daily newsletter.


Upcoming Events

Hilton Metropole | 225 Edgware Rd, London

Mon - Wed, March 18 - 20, 2024

Crypto’s premier institutional conference returns to London in March 2024. The DAS: London Experience: Attend expert-led panel discussions and fireside chats Hear the latest developments regarding the crypto and digital asset regulatory environment directly from policymakers and experts.

Salt Lake City, UT

WED - FRI, OCTOBER 9 - 11, 2024

Pack your bags, anon — we’re heading west! Join us in the beautiful Salt Lake City for the third installment of Permissionless. Come for the alpha, stay for the fresh air. Permissionless III promises unforgettable panels, killer networking opportunities, and mountains […]

recent research

Research report - cover graphics (1).jpg


In this report, we dive into crypto private market data to gather insights on where the future of the industry is headed. Despite a notable downturn in private raises, capital continues to infuse promising projects that aim to transform payments, banking, consumer experiences, community, and more, with 2023 being the fourth-largest year for crypto venture capital.


Elsewhere, Cowen’s crypto employees moved to StoneX and Nomura’s crypto custody firm CEO stepped down


If DeFi can just figure out how to improve both security and compliance, nothing would stop traditional finance from entering the game


Earnings from Coinbase and Robinhood boosted stock prices, while bitcoin’s open interest hits highs not seen since 2021, 2022


Ethereum Dencun will enable Ethereum transactions to be submitted as blobs, potentially alleviating the costs of posting data on the blockchain


After a rocky start, bitcoin ETF shareholders are now well in the green


Revolut said that the standalone crypto exchange is currently “invite only”