SCOTUS Considers Status of Legal Advice Given to Bitcoiner

A debate around attorney-client privilege that has reached the US Supreme Court could have far-reaching consequences


Alexander Supertramp/ modified by Blockworks


The US Supreme Court grappled with questions around attorney-client privilege in the case “In re Grand Jury” put before the judges on Monday.

The case involves the criminal investigation of an “early promoter of Bitcoin, expatriated from the United States in early 2014,” court papers said.

A law firm was hired to prepare the individual’s tax returns and provide legal advice around the ownership of cryptocurrencies.

Neither the identity of the bitcoiner, nor the firm representing them, has been made public.

The firm handed over 20,000 pages of documents to a grand jury investigation but refused to turn over records of certain communications, claiming “attorney-client privilege.”

Non-legal advice is not privileged, but the firm considered the records to include legal advice in addition to business advice — so-called “dual-purpose” communications.

Last year, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled that a more strict “primary purpose” standard should apply. The firm appealed this decision, asking to withhold documents where legal advice was “significant” — effectively seeking to expand the scope of protected communications.

In response, Justice Elena Kagan told the law firm that there should be stricter standards around the “primary purpose test,” which is used to determine the main purpose of communication between a lawyer and the client.

“We’ve had the attorney-client privilege for a long time, and until 2014, nobody ever suggested that the test that you’re proposing is the right one,” Justice Kagan said.

“This is a big ask, and it’s an ask that’s not particularly consistent with the underlying nature of what the attorney-client privilege is supposed to be protecting,” the justice added.

The law firm’s petitioner, Daniel B. Levin, in response, told Kagan that stricter standards will make it difficult for lawyers to guarantee that client consultations were confidential, and that breaking down communication would be “inherently impossible.”

“It creates the kind of uncertainty this Court warned against in Upjohn,” he said, referring to the 1981 case Upjohn Co. v. United States.

To this, Justice Sonia Sotomayor argued, “I don’t know why lawyer advice that’s predominantly business should be protected simply because you sneak in some minor legal consideration.”

The case is being closely watched by legal and business professionals, including the American Bar Association and the Chamber of Commerce, who are among the parties that filed amicus briefs in support of the law firm.

Don’t miss the next big story – join our free daily newsletter.


Upcoming Events

WED - FRI, OCTOBER 9 - 11, 2024

Pack your bags, anon — we’re heading west! Join us in the beautiful Salt Lake City for the third installment of Permissionless. Come for the alpha, stay for the fresh air. Permissionless III promises unforgettable panels, killer networking opportunities, and mountains […]

MON - WED, MARCH 18 - 20, 2024

Crypto’s premier institutional conference returns to London in March 2024. The DAS: London Experience:  Attend expert-led panel discussions and fireside chats  Hear the latest developments regarding the crypto and digital asset regulatory environment directly from policymakers and experts   Grow your network […]

recent research

Pyth Cover.jpg


Pyth is a low latency pull-based oracle. In a future that looks increasingly high frequency, with various alt L1s and L2s that have significantly shorter block times than Ethereum, and an explosion of “high-frequency” protocols such as oracle or CLOB perp DEXs, Pyth’s low latency oracle product looks much better positioned to capture a significant amount of market share in comparison to competitors.


Binance settlement “an important part of clearing the way for the next bull market cycle,” crypto hedge fund executive says


Hester Peirce reiterated Tuesday that court cases are not the only path to regulatory clarity for crypto, but her colleagues do not always agree


The indictment followed leaks Monday that a Binance settlement deal was forthcoming


The Binance executive is also reportedly set to make an appearance in a Seattle courtroom Tuesday


Monday developments reaffirmed the US as unfriendly to crypto while also offering a potential bullish outlook for segment firms, industry watchers say


It’s unclear what “actions” the CFTC, DOJ and Treasury will announce Tuesday afternoon