SEC Sues Dragonchain Over $16.5M ICO

Dragonchain is charged with violating the Securities Act of 1933

article-image

Gary Gensler, Chair, US Securities and Exchange Commission | Blockworks exclusive art by Axel Rangel

share
  • DRGN token dropped over 15% since the announcement
  • SEC is requesting Dragonchain return the $16.5 million with interest

The SEC is suing startup founder John Joseph Roets and three entities he controls — Dragonchain, the Dragonchain Foundation and The Dragon Company — for raising $16.5 million in unregistered cryptoasset securities offerings.

Open source blockchain Dragonchain was originally developed as Disney’s private blockchain platform in Seattle in 2016. The court filing, in the US District Court for the Western District of Washington, charges the defendants with violating the Securities Act of 1933.

The SEC claimed both the 2017 presale and the Initial Coin Offering (ICO) of Dragon tokens (DRGN) were unregistered crypto asset securities offerings that allegedly raised approximately $14 million from over 5,000 investors.

Another $2.5 million worth of DRGN was allegedly offered and sold between 2019 and 2022 “to cover business expenditures and market Dragonchain technology.”

The agency now demands disgorgement of the proceeds with prejudgment interest and a civil monetary penalty.

The altcoin has fallen sharply — roughly 15% after the announcement — $0.02 at the time of publication.

Loading Tweet..

DRGN has been under investigation by the SEC since 2018, and the company recently published a letter in response to the SEC’s recommendation to charge the aforementioned parties on April 27, 2022. 

Over the four-year-long dealings with the SEC, Roets’ argument wasn’t taken seriously, he wrote in the letter.

“We’ve never had an opportunity to present the case that the DRGN is a software license and utility token versus a financial security,” Roets said.

He added that the SEC is “picking and choosing projects to target…while giving a free pass to others.”

The company maintains that a DRGN is not a financial security and that during the sale of the DRGN software micro-license, purchasers who paid with bitcoin (BTC) or ether (ETH) directly acquired the utility token as opposed to making an investment.

The SEC has been ramping up its enforcement actions against purveyors of cryptoassets, a trend anticipated to continue.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 24 - 26, 2026

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Flying_Tulip.png

Research

Flying Tulip's perpetual put option provides real principal protection, but investors must pay a valuation premium today for products that have to be built over the next 24 months. This structure works best as a stablecoin substitute where the put allows continuous monitoring—accept opportunity cost in exchange for asymmetric upside if the team executes on its ambitious cross-collateral architecture.

article-image

As flows consolidate and volatility fades, finding edge now means knowing which games are still worth playing

article-image

Value distribution came to $1.9 billion distributed in Q3, though total revenues have yet to beat 2021 heights

article-image

MegaETH public sale auction ends tomorrow, and the free money machine has attracted people who like free money

article-image

With tBTC under the hood, Acre abstracts bridging and converts non-BTC rewards to bitcoin

article-image

Accountable is also eyeing mid-November for mainnet launch

article-image

“Adjusted for size, I think it may be the most successful ETP launch of all time,” Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan says