SEC Files for Temporary Restraining Order Against Binance, CZ

The SEC seeks to prevent defendants from “destroying, altering or concealing relevant records”

article-image

Aleksandra Sova/Shutterstock.com modified by Blockworks

share

The SEC has petitioned a court for a temporary restraining order against Binance and its affiliates — BAM Management and BAM Trading — in a move that could freeze the assets of Binance.US.

The SEC’s motion, filed in the US District Court for the District of Columbia on Tuesday, named Binance, BAM Management and BAM Trading. 

If approved, the restraining order would also prevent defendants from “destroying, altering or concealing relevant records.” It comes one day after the SEC sued Binance. 

The order, if granted by the court, would also allow the SEC to order “expedited discovery” of potential evidence. The regulator filed for its motion to be approved on an “expedited basis,” saying a speedy outcome would “ensure the safety of customer assets and prevent the dissipation of available assets for any judgment.” 

In making its case, SEC lawyers cited “years of violative conduct” from Binance and its affiliates, as well as “disregard [for] the laws of the United States, evasion of regulatory oversight, and open questions about various financial transfers” when it comes to its customers. 

Binance.US told Blockworks in a statement that “User assets remain safe and secure and the platform continues to be fully operational with deposits and withdrawals functioning as normal.”

The SEC also requested the “repatriation and other specified relief concerning the custody and control of fiat currency and crypto assets deposited, held, traded, and/or accrued by customers on the Binance.US crypto asset trading platform or otherwise held for the benefit of customers of BAM and the Binance.US Platform.”

The SEC on Monday filed a lawsuit against Binance, BAM Management, BAM Trading and CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao alleging violations of the Exchange Act, Securities Act and potential fraud. 

The SEC also claimed that BAM Trading’s staking program on Binance.US is an investment contract — and falls under the definition of a security as a result.  

The regulatory agency also claims Binance and Zhao were “intimately involved in directing BAM Trading’s U.S. business operations.” Zhao was also named in the temporary restraining order. 

Binance denied the SEC’s claims, saying “most recently, we have engaged in extensive good-faith discussions to reach a negotiated settlement to resolve their investigations.

Binance.US added in their statement that “Until recently – despite years of engagement – the SEC Staff has not expressed a concern about the safety of customer assets. And through near around-the-clock dialogue over the past week, company’s counsel addressed SEC Staff’s concerns regarding the safety of customer assets. Despite the information the company has provided to ensure SEC Staff of the safety of customer assets, the Staff has nonetheless decided to file the motion seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. While we are disappointed by this action, we look forward to defending ourselves in court.”

Binance did not respond to a request for comment.

Updated June 6th at 6:10pm ET: Added comments from Binance.US


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 24 - 26, 2026

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Research Report Templates (27).png

Research

Solana's spot trading landscape will remain bifurcated: prop AMMs will own the short-tail of highly liquid pairs, while passive AMMs continue drifting toward the long-tail. Both can win via vertical integration, but in opposite directions: passive AMMs are moving closer to users through token issuance platforms (e.g., Pump-PumpSwap, MetaDAO-Futarchy AMM), while prop AMMs are moving down the stack into transaction landing services and infrastructure (e.g., HumidiFi-Nozomi). The venues most at risk are legacy AMMs with limited end-user control and no durable, launch-driven source of order flow.

article-image

Some systems improve by failing — and crypto has no choice

article-image

Yield Basis introduces an IL-free AMM design that already dominates BTC DEX liquidity

article-image

Maybe tokenholders don’t need the rights that corporate shareholders have come to expect

article-image

As Hyperliquid and Lighter battle for perps DEX dominance, Boros could capture the structural upside

article-image

Investors are often right about the future, but wrong about the returns

article-image

A look back at 2025, reflections on our industry, and what it means for Blockworks in 2026