Binance Pushes Back on SEC Lawsuit, Denies Commingling User Assets

Binance claims that it tried to reach a settlement with the SEC ahead of the lawsuit

article-image

Artwork by Axel Rangel

share

Binance claims that it is “disappointed” with the SEC’s allegations that the exchange mishandled funds, operated as an unregistered exchange and sold unregistered securities. 

The SEC’s recent lawsuit names Binance, CEO Changpeng Zhao, Binance.US and BAM Trading as defendants. 

“Most recently, we have engaged in extensive good-faith discussions to reach a negotiated settlement to resolve their investigations.  But despite our efforts, with its complaint today the SEC abandoned that process and instead chose to act unilaterally and litigate.  We are disheartened by that choice,” Binance said in its statement.

Read more: The SEC Allegations Against Binance: How Bad Is It?

In a separate tweet, Binance.US said, “Simply put, today’s filing is unjustified by the facts, by the law, or by the Commission’s own precedent.”

Loading Tweet..

Binance alluded to Coinbase’s ongoing legal battle with the SEC, saying that the lawsuit is another example of the Commission regulating “with the blunt weapons of enforcement and litigation rather than the thoughtful, nuanced approach demanded by this dynamic and complex technology. Unilaterally labeling certain tokens and services as securities – even ones over which other U.S. authorities have asserted jurisdiction – only compounds these problems.”

Coinbase and the SEC are currently locked in a legal battle over defining crypto regulation.

The exchange directly opposed the SEC’s allegations that Binance.US commingled user funds, and said that user assets are “safe and secure.”

“Through accounts owned and controlled by Zhao and Binance, billions of U.S. dollars of customer funds from both Binance Platforms were commingled in an account held by a Zhaocontrolled entity (called Merit Peak Limited), which funds were subsequently transferred to a third party apparently in connection with the purchase and sale of crypto assets,” the SEC’s lawsuit claimed.

The lawsuit also alleges that “Binance and BAM Trading, under Zhao’s leadership and control, have unlawfully offered three essential securities market functions—exchange, broker-dealer, and clearing agency—on the Binance Platforms without registering with the SEC. Acutely aware that U.S. law requires registration for these functions, Defendants nevertheless chose not to register, so they could evade the critical regulatory oversight designed to protect investors and markets.”


Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Salt Lake City, UT

WED - FRI, OCTOBER 9 - 11, 2024

Pack your bags, anon — we’re heading west! Join us in the beautiful Salt Lake City for the third installment of Permissionless. Come for the alpha, stay for the fresh air. Permissionless III promises unforgettable panels, killer networking opportunities, and mountains […]

recent research

Research report HL cover.jpg

Research

It's increasingly apparent that orderbooks represent the most efficient model for perpetual trading, with the primary obstacle being that the most popular blockchains are ill-suited for hosting a fully onchain orderbook. Hyperliquid is a perpetual trading protocol built on its own L1 that aims to replicate the user experience of centralized exchanges while offering a fully onchain orderbook.

article-image

CoinFund, EDX Clearing and Nonco are among the first users of the offering

article-image

Crypto mixers continue to be a target of government scrutiny

article-image

If recent history is any gauge, most teams still opt for the “sugar high” of short-term degen adoption over pursuit of more sustainable users

article-image

The iShares Bitcoin Trust saw zero flows Wednesday, according to Farside Investors, after seeing $15.5 billion enter the fund in its first 71 days

article-image

The Merlin Chain Bitcoin layer-2 grew by roughly 2,000% in the past month

article-image

The DOJ charged the CEO and CTO with a count of conspiracy to commit money laundering and a count of conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmitting service