Hong Kong’s Digital Assets Industry Needs Custodian Rules

Interest in digital assets exists, especially for institutional investors in the City, but clear regulations need to be established around custody, says Hex Trust CEO

article-image

Alessio Quaglini, CEO of Hex Trust

share

key takeaways

  • Hong Kong regulates crypto exchanges under its virtual assets service provider taxonomy, but doesn’t give guidance to digital assets custodians
  • Regulators in the city need to establish rules around digital asset custodians that are as unique as the asset class itself, argues Hex Trust CEO

Hong Kong’s institutional investors have demonstrated significant interest in digital assets, but unclear regulation around custodians for these assets is holding the industry back, says Alessio Quaglini, the CEO of Hex Trust. 

“What I can say is there are no clear regulations in Hong Kong for digital assets,” Quaglini told Blockworks. “What we have to live with is basically the regulation for custody of traditional assets.”

While Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission, the city’s securities watchdog, has taken what some observers call a “progressive” approach to incorporating digital assets into institutional finance, rules around custodians are the missing link. That’s not to say that the SFC doesn’t acknowledge the necessity of asset custodians for crypto, but rather the current licensing regime is not compatible with the nature of the industry. 

Current SFC rules require that licensed entities — such as fund managers — need to appoint custodians for their client assets including cryptocurrencies and other tokens. The SFC doesn’t license custodians, it only defines criteria for eligibility which usually means they will have to be either a bank or trust company.

Virtual asset exchanges, however, are licensed under securities law and licensed as either a Type 1, securities dealer, or Type 7, an automated trading service provider, and they must have a trustee or corporate service provider license. 

Going against the grain

But the inherent problem with all of this is it operates under the assumption that all digital assets are securities, which effectively goes against the grain of regulatory trends around the world. 

“Now the issue with digital assets is that they can fall under different asset classes,” Quaglini continued. 

Instead of forcing a square peg in a round hole by using the exact same infrastructure as securities for custody,  Quaglini proposes a new SFC license type, a “Type 0” that solely deals with the safeguarding of client assets as opposed to farming that responsibility off to banks or trust companies. 

But even if the SFC hasn’t provided clear regulation regarding custody, Quaglini thinks that they are going in the right direction with the Virtual Asset Services Providers licensing regime. Though he cautions that if future regulation around custody is unclear or “too restrictive” or unclear it’s going to push customers to unregulated platforms. 

Something never seen before

All of this comes as Quaglini says the influx of capital into the digital assets market over the last year is “something we’ve never seen before, not even in 2017.”

Quaglini points to the two existing licensed asset managers in the City as an example of institutional interest in digital assets, along with banks, hedge funds, and brokers. 

Although Quaglini hasn’t heard much from the smaller local Hong Kong banks, and many of the banks in Hong Kong with significant China exposure are non-starters, he said that Hex Trust has been approached by 17 of the top 20 global banks to help them with their digital asset strategies.

But for the industry to get to the next step, there needs to be an initial framework for regulated digital asset custodians, otherwise all of this institutional interest is going to be lost to unregulated platforms. 

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Old Billingsgate

Mon - Wed, October 13 - 15, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

Industry City | Brooklyn, NY

TUES - THURS, JUNE 24 - 26, 2025

Permissionless IV serves as the definitive gathering for crypto’s technical founders, developers, and builders to come together and create the future.If you’re ready to shape the future of crypto, Permissionless IV is where it happens.

Brooklyn, NY

SUN - MON, JUN. 22 - 23, 2025

Blockworks and Cracked Labs are teaming up for the third installment of the Permissionless Hackathon, happening June 22–23, 2025 in Brooklyn, NY. This is a 36-hour IRL builder sprint where developers, designers, and creatives ship real projects solving real problems across […]

recent research

Research Report Templates (8).png

Research

Meta-aggregators like Titan and Kamino Swap improve price execution for users, making the Solana swapping landscape more competitive. Jupiter has incorporated meta-aggregation features into its latest routing engine to keep users on its front end (own the user, own the flow). At large, teams are treating swaps as a commoditized complement, offering incredibly cheap or free swaps to own the end-user and increase demand for high-margin product offerings (multi-product DeFi). On another note, the divergence in the concentration of aggregator volume between DEXs suggests increased specialization at the DEX layer by asset type.

article-image

Many community banks and credit unions feel like they missed the fintech craze — and they don’t want to miss stablecoins

article-image

BlackRock COO Rob Goldstein noted that the firm had been looking into crypto since 2017

article-image

With the June FOMC meeting coming up, the Fed remains unlikely to cut interest rates. Is this the right move?

article-image

The crypto-optional shooter is expected to release on Steam in a few weeks

article-image

The new airdrop campaign reaches 50,000 users, setting the stage for Spark’s 10-year token distribution