Hong Kong’s Digital Assets Industry Needs Custodian Rules

Interest in digital assets exists, especially for institutional investors in the City, but clear regulations need to be established around custody, says Hex Trust CEO


Alessio Quaglini, CEO of Hex Trust


key takeaways

  • Hong Kong regulates crypto exchanges under its virtual assets service provider taxonomy, but doesn’t give guidance to digital assets custodians
  • Regulators in the city need to establish rules around digital asset custodians that are as unique as the asset class itself, argues Hex Trust CEO

Hong Kong’s institutional investors have demonstrated significant interest in digital assets, but unclear regulation around custodians for these assets is holding the industry back, says Alessio Quaglini, the CEO of Hex Trust. 

“What I can say is there are no clear regulations in Hong Kong for digital assets,” Quaglini told Blockworks. “What we have to live with is basically the regulation for custody of traditional assets.”

While Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission, the city’s securities watchdog, has taken what some observers call a “progressive” approach to incorporating digital assets into institutional finance, rules around custodians are the missing link. That’s not to say that the SFC doesn’t acknowledge the necessity of asset custodians for crypto, but rather the current licensing regime is not compatible with the nature of the industry. 

Current SFC rules require that licensed entities — such as fund managers — need to appoint custodians for their client assets including cryptocurrencies and other tokens. The SFC doesn’t license custodians, it only defines criteria for eligibility which usually means they will have to be either a bank or trust company.

Virtual asset exchanges, however, are licensed under securities law and licensed as either a Type 1, securities dealer, or Type 7, an automated trading service provider, and they must have a trustee or corporate service provider license. 

Going against the grain

But the inherent problem with all of this is it operates under the assumption that all digital assets are securities, which effectively goes against the grain of regulatory trends around the world. 

“Now the issue with digital assets is that they can fall under different asset classes,” Quaglini continued. 

Instead of forcing a square peg in a round hole by using the exact same infrastructure as securities for custody,  Quaglini proposes a new SFC license type, a “Type 0” that solely deals with the safeguarding of client assets as opposed to farming that responsibility off to banks or trust companies. 

But even if the SFC hasn’t provided clear regulation regarding custody, Quaglini thinks that they are going in the right direction with the Virtual Asset Services Providers licensing regime. Though he cautions that if future regulation around custody is unclear or “too restrictive” or unclear it’s going to push customers to unregulated platforms. 

Something never seen before

All of this comes as Quaglini says the influx of capital into the digital assets market over the last year is “something we’ve never seen before, not even in 2017.”

Quaglini points to the two existing licensed asset managers in the City as an example of institutional interest in digital assets, along with banks, hedge funds, and brokers. 

Although Quaglini hasn’t heard much from the smaller local Hong Kong banks, and many of the banks in Hong Kong with significant China exposure are non-starters, he said that Hex Trust has been approached by 17 of the top 20 global banks to help them with their digital asset strategies.

But for the industry to get to the next step, there needs to be an initial framework for regulated digital asset custodians, otherwise all of this institutional interest is going to be lost to unregulated platforms. 


Upcoming Events

WED - FRI, OCTOBER 9 - 11, 2024

Pack your bags, anon — we’re heading west! Join us in the beautiful Salt Lake City for the third installment of Permissionless. Come for the alpha, stay for the fresh air. Permissionless III promises unforgettable panels, killer networking opportunities, and mountains […]

MON - WED, MARCH 18 - 20, 2024

Crypto’s premier institutional conference returns to London in March 2024. The DAS: London Experience:  Attend expert-led panel discussions and fireside chats  Hear the latest developments regarding the crypto and digital asset regulatory environment directly from policymakers and experts   Grow your network […]

recent research

Pyth Cover.jpg


Pyth is a low latency pull-based oracle. In a future that looks increasingly high frequency, with various alt L1s and L2s that have significantly shorter block times than Ethereum, and an explosion of “high-frequency” protocols such as oracle or CLOB perp DEXs, Pyth’s low latency oracle product looks much better positioned to capture a significant amount of market share in comparison to competitors.


Hester Peirce reiterated Tuesday that court cases are not the only path to regulatory clarity for crypto, but her colleagues do not always agree


The indictment followed leaks Monday that a Binance settlement deal was forthcoming


The Binance executive is also reportedly set to make an appearance in a Seattle courtroom Tuesday


Monday developments reaffirmed the US as unfriendly to crypto while also offering a potential bullish outlook for segment firms, industry watchers say


It’s unclear what “actions” the CFTC, DOJ and Treasury will announce Tuesday afternoon


Some 18,000 accounts have already sent $27 million in crypto to a one-way bridge controlled by a Blast multisig