Juno’s DAO Votes To Confiscate $35M in Tokens From Whale in Messy Dispute
The community vote settles a governance dispute over an unintended token bounty
Source: Shutterstock
key takeaways
- Proposal 20, which passed over the weekend, is expected to take effect on May 4
- Over 3 million JUNO tokens will be transferred to a community-controlled wallet
Juno, a smart contract platform that runs on the Cosmos blockchain, is on the verge of resolving a two-month-old governance conundrum.
An upgrade, slated to be executed Wednesday, will strip some three million JUNO tokens from a single wallet, belonging to an organization alleged to have exploited a loophole in the token’s initial distribution.
Juno’s token was distributed to stakers of the native Cosmos asset ATOM, but the team implemented a 50,000 “whale cap” — and deliberately excluded centralized exchanges, such as Kraken and Binance, which offer staking services.
In March, 40% of token holders signaled their intent to remove tokens that were distributed to a collection of wallets that were later determined to belong to a single entity, in contravention of the stakedrop rules.
On-chain sleuths discovered, in October 2021, that multiple recipient wallets of the initial drop were pooled together, implying that they belonged to the same owner or organization.
But stripping the JUNO assets from the wallet was controversial.
Some viewed the idea of confiscating tokens as a property rights violation of sorts. But centralization of governance power was broadly considered a risk to the long-term prospects of the whole platform.
The owner of the wallet in question came forward to explain that they were a team that managed assets on behalf of clients. In the ensuing community discussion, a new consensus emerged. The wallet had not gamed the airdrop, but was instead ineligible for the stakedrop on account of being a virtual currency exchange service.
Before any concrete action could take pace, the blockchain had to be upgraded to allow Juno governance to execute smart contracts. Then, a subsequent proposal could implement the voter’s intent on-chain.
Meanwhile, the rogue entity, known as CCN, made a proposal of its own, offering to split the funds equally with the DAO. It then used its tokens to vote in favor of the compromise. But the proposal was overwhelmingly rejected.
CCN tried once more, offering to distribute the JUNO proportionally to its clients, following a know your customer (KYC) process from an independent auditor. That, too, was resoundingly defeated, with just 3.6% voting in favor.
The latest proposal, 20, gave the community a vote on an upgrade that will remove CCN’s disproportionate token ownership and voting power. It passed April 29 with 71.2% of the vote.
Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.
Explore the growing intersection between crypto, macroeconomics, policy and finance with Ben Strack, Casey Wagner and Felix Jauvin. Subscribe to the On the Margin newsletter.
The Lightspeed newsletter is all things Solana, in your inbox, every day. Subscribe to daily Solana news from Jack Kubinec and Jeff Albus.
