Ex-Celsius CEO files motion to dismiss in FTC suit 

Mashinsky’s motion to dismiss follows a similar one from co-defendant Hanoch Goldstein

article-image

Former Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky | Kevin McGovern/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks

share

Former Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky has filed a motion to dismiss in the Federal Trade Commission’s suit against him. 

Mashinsky’s motion to dismiss follows a similar one filed by co-defendant and Celsius co-founder Hanoch “Nuke” Goldstein. Mashinsky’s push is largely focused on one of the arguments made by Goldstein, which claims that the FTC “does not allege a violation of an FTC rule.”

Parts of Goldstein’s motion to dismiss places blame on Mashinsky and others at Celsius. 

“Mashinsky was responsible for leading almost all of the acts of misconduct alleged in the Complaint, including conducting weekly marketing and advertising videos called ‘Ask Mashinsky Anything,” Goldstein’s lawyers argued.

In Goldstein’s motion to dismiss, his lawyers argued that “the FTC’s complaint largely describes allegations of misconduct by others at Celsius, and then relies upon perfunctory and boilerplate allegations that Goldstein was part of their scheme.”

Goldstein also argued that the FTC’s settlement with Celsius, which was announced earlier this summer, permanently bars the “alleged misconduct.”

The FTC and bankrupt lender settled for $4.7 billion back in July, and limited the former lender from engaging in business practices linked to crypto assets.

The FTC’s “Complaint cannot substantiate a claim that Mashinsky ‘is violating’ or is ‘about to violate’ the law because Mashinsky resigned from his position as CEO of Celsius” in September of last year, though a typo in the court document says 2023. 

The FTC’s complaint alleges that the defendants violated the Gramm-Leach-Bliley act, which covers consumer financial privacy. Though, as both Mashinsky and Goldstein point out, the original FTC complaint “fails to allege” a violation of the act. 

Mashinsky also faces a lawsuit from the DOJ, and a recent unsealed motion revealed that lawyers for the government froze his assets in August.


Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

Explore the growing intersection between crypto, macroeconomics, policy and finance with Ben Strack, Casey Wagner and Felix Jauvin. Subscribe to the Forward Guidance newsletter.

Get alpha directly in your inbox with the 0xResearch newsletter — market highlights, charts, degen trade ideas, governance updates, and more.

The Lightspeed newsletter is all things Solana, in your inbox, every day. Subscribe to daily Solana news from Jack Kubinec and Jeff Albus.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 18 - 20, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

Brooklyn, NY

TUES - THURS, JUNE 24 - 26, 2025

Permissionless IV serves as the definitive gathering for crypto’s technical founders, developers, and builders to come together and create the future.If you’re ready to shape the future of crypto, Permissionless IV is where it happens.

recent research

Research Report Templates.png

Research

An overview of the Base Ecosystem, with a focus on market leaders.

article-image

Although bitcoin hitting $120k by year’s end is looking unlikely

article-image

About 270 million HYPE has been claimed, valued around $7.6 billion

article-image

Stanford professors David Mazières and Dan Boneh will lead the lab alongside a cohort of graduate student researchers

article-image

With more companies holding BTC, bitcoin yielding strategies could become “a new corporate finance norm,” CoinShares posed

article-image

The proposal comes after Polygon governance considered a controversial use of bridged liquidity for yield

article-image

Can the community balance its decentralized ethos with the need for inclusivity and constructive debate?