SBF attorneys make last minute request to enter new evidence

Bankman-Fried’s attorneys are once again vying for an angle with judge Kaplan

article-image

Artwork by Crystal Le

share

Sam Bankman-Fried’s criminal trial continues in Manhattan Tuesday morning after his defense team submitted an eleventh-hour plea to bring new evidence before the court. 

Bankman-Fried’s attorneys submitted a motion to the court late Monday night asking for permission to cross-examine government witness Gary Wang about how attorneys were involved in structuring and issuing loans from Alameda. 

Wang, who pleaded guilty in December 2022 to four counts of fraud and conspiracy, was a founder and former executive at FTX. He testified on Friday that he received personal loans of around $200 to $300 million from Alameda, which he used to fund venture capital investments and purchase property in the Bahamas. 

Because Wang told the prosecution that “a round of lawyers at the company” may have presented the loans to him in either 2019 or 2020, the defense is asking the court’s permission to pursue this line of questioning. 

“The Government’s direct examination of Mr. Wang has already elicited that FTX attorneys were present and involved in structuring and executing the loans, and that Mr. Bankman-Fried was aware of their involvement,” Bankman-Fried attorneys Mark Cohen and Chrisitian Everdell wrote in their Monday evening motion. “Accordingly, the defense seeks to crossexamine Mr. Wang further about his knowledge of the lawyers’ involvement.” 

Southern District of New York senior judge Lewis Kaplan is expected to rule on the motion Tuesday morning before cross-examination on Wang resumes. Kaplan has so far expressed growing frustration with the defense’s “repetitive” nature of questioning and attorneys’ tendency to make these late-night motions. 

“Anything else we can usefully accomplish tonight? Am I going to be expecting another midnight filing?” Kaplan asked counsel last week.

Alameda Research’s FTX account was granted secret permission to “allow negative,” meaning it could trade even with no balance, Wang added in his testimony last week.


Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

Explore the growing intersection between crypto, macroeconomics, policy and finance with Ben Strack, Casey Wagner and Felix Jauvin. Subscribe to the Forward Guidance newsletter.

Get alpha directly in your inbox with the 0xResearch newsletter — market highlights, charts, degen trade ideas, governance updates, and more.

The Lightspeed newsletter is all things Solana, in your inbox, every day. Subscribe to daily Solana news from Jack Kubinec and Jeff Albus.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 18 - 20, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

Brooklyn, NY

TUES - THURS, JUNE 24 - 26, 2025

Permissionless IV serves as the definitive gathering for crypto’s technical founders, developers, and builders to come together and create the future.If you’re ready to shape the future of crypto, Permissionless IV is where it happens.

recent research

Research Report Templates.png

Research

An overview of the Base Ecosystem, with a focus on market leaders.

article-image

Although bitcoin hitting $120k by year’s end is looking unlikely

article-image

About 270 million HYPE has been claimed, valued around $7.6 billion

article-image

Stanford professors David Mazières and Dan Boneh will lead the lab alongside a cohort of graduate student researchers

article-image

With more companies holding BTC, bitcoin yielding strategies could become “a new corporate finance norm,” CoinShares posed

article-image

The proposal comes after Polygon governance considered a controversial use of bridged liquidity for yield

article-image

Can the community balance its decentralized ethos with the need for inclusivity and constructive debate?