ZKsync tokens worth $5M swiped in admin account breach

The team says an attacker minted unclaimed tokens from ZKsync’s 2024 airdrop

article-image

CryptoFX/Shutterstock and Adobe modified by Blockworks

share

This is a segment from The Drop newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe.


The Ethereum scaling-focused ZKsync team said one of their admin accounts was accessed and compromised, leading to the theft of over 100 million tokens.

The attacker swiped roughly 111 million ZK, or $5 million worth of the token, the ZKsync team said. This was the amount left unclaimed from the controversial ZK airdrop that took place in June last year.

The team said the incident is “isolated” and added that “all user funds are safe and have never been at risk.” 

ZKsync later identified a wallet address believed to be in the attacker’s possession and explained that the perpetrator had called a function in the airdrop contract that minted the unclaimed tokens. 

“The attacker called the sweepUnclaimed() function that minted approximately 111 million unclaimed ZK tokens from the aidrop [sic] contracts,” ZKsync’s X account said.

Loading Tweet..

That wallet also moved over 1,000 ETH two days ago onto Ethereum’s mainnet. Its first transaction is from three days ago. DeBank data shows that the wallet holds $3.7 million in ZK and ETH tokens on ZKsync’s chain and $1.76 million in ETH on Ethereum’s mainnet as of Wednesday morning, meaning that wallet has a net worth of over $5.5 million.

We don’t know yet how the account was breached, nor do we know the identity of the attacker. 

ZKsync co-inventor Alex Gluchowski wrote Tuesday morning: “We’re actively investigating this incident and will publish the full update once the investigation and recovery efforts are complete.”

Gluchowski also emphasized in a post: “No code was compromised — an operator key was compromised.”

Image: ZK token price in Pacific Time, showing a price plunge before the 6:49 am X post announcing the breach.

Some X users have accused the ZK breach of being an inside job (without showing evidence), while others have alleged that the ZK token is a scam in its entirety. Blockworks has reached out to ZKsync for comment, but did not receive a response by press time.

ZK’s price fell shortly after 6:30 am PT, right before the team’s first post about the breach at 6:49 am PT.

The token hit an all-time low of $0.041 on Tuesday.

By Wednesday morning, ZK’s price was up roughly 5% in the past 24 hours, but remains down 30% in the past month, per CoinGecko data.

Updated April 16, 2025 at 3:15 pm ET: Updated headline.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 24 - 26, 2026

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Research Report Templates (3).png

Research

South Korea is emerging as one of the most important global hubs for regulated digital assets, and Upbit sits at the center of this shift. Naver’s proposed acquisition could create the country’s dominant super app for payments, trading, and digital finance. This report breaks down the numbers, the regulatory tailwinds, the economics of the deal, and why the merger may unlock one of the most attractive asymmetries in Korea’s public markets.

article-image

Lido unveils a new buyback plan while BTC treasury companies slip below mNAV — can either model can truly return value?

article-image

If financial nihilism has driven you into memecoins, zero-day options, and sports betting, consider financial optimism instead

article-image

A new Sui-based protocol promises to unlock Bitcoin’s idle liquidity and eliminate wrapped-token risk

article-image

Could blockchain rails finally realize Ted Nelson’s non-linear, pro-creator “docuverse”?

article-image

What does Uniswap’s proposal to activate protocol fees and unify incentives mean for UNI token holders?

article-image

A recent mistrial illustrates how juries need more background information when it comes to judging complex systems like Ethereum