Financials

Revenue generated by applications deployed across multiple chains is attributed to the specific chain where it is earned. Different versions of applications are combined under the parent application, For example, Uniswap V2 and V3 are combined as Uniswap. 

Data is sourced from Defillama. Excludes Circle and Tether.

Sourced from Defillama

Application Revenue 

Application Fees generally tracks the total amount users pay to interact with an application. This metric includes supply-side values that do not accrue to the application, such as Uniswap trading fees that accrue to liquidity providers, marking a key difference from Application Revenue.

Application Fees by Chain can serve as a proxy for the activity generated by the application layer of a chain. Note, **this metric is unfiltered**, so it also includes value generated by the business operations of the application. For example, fees for liquid staking protocols will include the staking yield generated on AUM, which is not a proxy for the amount of activity generated by an application. 

Data is sourced from Defillama and excludes Circle and Tether.

Sourced from Defillama 

Application Fees

Application Revenue by Sector

Application Fees by Sector

Use the interval groups to quickly filter the timeframe

Asset Screener

Funding and M&A

Chain Comparison

App Compare

L2 Comparison

Avalanche

Aptos

Berachain

Bitcoin

Celestia

Ethereum

Polygon PoS

Solana

Arbitrum

Base

Celo

Mode

OP Mainnet

Polygon zkEVM

SKALE

Unichain

ZKsync Era

Zora

Aries

Ellipsis Labs

Fluid

MakerDAO

Marinade

Morpho

Raydium

Polymarket

Pump.Fun

Vector

Virtuals

OP Superchain

ZKsync Elastic Chains

Bitcoin ETF

Ethereum ETF

Markets

Sectors

Layer 1

Layer 2

Finance

Consumer

Chain Clusters

ETFS

App Compare: Financials

Asset Screener

Application Revenue by Sector

Application Revenue

Application Fees

Application Fees by Sector

Related News