Bogus Trading Bot Operator Guilty of $100M Fraud

EmpiresX claimed it operated a trading bot that guaranteed returns to investors and now founders are on the run

article-image

Source: Shutterstock

share
  • Chief Trader pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud
  • Founders Emerson Pires and Glavio Goncalves have allegedly fled to their home country, Brazil

A Florida-based head trader of cryptocurrency platform EmpiresX pleaded guilty to an alleged Ponzi scheme that collected $100 million from investors.

28-year-old Joshua David Nicholas admitted to promoting a company-operated trading bot along with co-conspirators, claiming that it used artificial and human intelligence to maximize gains for investors, the Department of Justice (DOJ) said in a statement Thursday.

Joshua David Nicholas

Prosecutors allege that, instead of providing a profitable service, they rewarded earlier investors with money collected from later investors. EmpiresX also never registered its investment program as an offering with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), nor did it have an exemption to do so, the DOJ said.

Nicholas pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud. He faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison. 

The plea follows a June indictment, when DOJ officials charged Nicholas along with the founders of the firm, Emerson Pires and Flavio Goncalves, with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and securities fraud. The latter two were also charged with conspiracy to commit international money laundering.

On the same day as the DOJ’s indictment, the SEC also charged all three individuals over allegations of luring investors with false claims of 1% daily profits and misappropriating investor money for personal use.

Pires and Goncalves, both Brazilian nationals, have allegedly fled to their home country.

Emerson Pires and Flavio Goncalves

A sentencing date for Nicholas hasn’t yet been scheduled. Julie Holt, the public defender representing Nicholas, didn’t return Blockworks’ request for comment by press time.

The debate over which cryptocurrencies, and therefore which adjacent businesses, are considered securities currently shrouds the entire industry.

SEC Chair Gary Gensler said on Thursday that he would support a growing consensus that cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin — which he terms non-security tokens — to be handled by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, rather than the SEC. Still, he said a majority of crypto tokens are securities that should come under his jurisdiction.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 24 - 26, 2026

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Research Report Templates (3).png

Research

South Korea is emerging as one of the most important global hubs for regulated digital assets, and Upbit sits at the center of this shift. Naver’s proposed acquisition could create the country’s dominant super app for payments, trading, and digital finance. This report breaks down the numbers, the regulatory tailwinds, the economics of the deal, and why the merger may unlock one of the most attractive asymmetries in Korea’s public markets.

article-image

Lido unveils a new buyback plan while BTC treasury companies slip below mNAV — can either model can truly return value?

article-image

If financial nihilism has driven you into memecoins, zero-day options, and sports betting, consider financial optimism instead

article-image

A new Sui-based protocol promises to unlock Bitcoin’s idle liquidity and eliminate wrapped-token risk

article-image

Could blockchain rails finally realize Ted Nelson’s non-linear, pro-creator “docuverse”?

article-image

What does Uniswap’s proposal to activate protocol fees and unify incentives mean for UNI token holders?

article-image

A recent mistrial illustrates how juries need more background information when it comes to judging complex systems like Ethereum