BlockFi, FTX downplay data breach involving claims administration platform Kroll

The breach Thursday calls into question the security measures employed by the third-party vendor

article-image

John Hanson Pye/Shutterstock, modified by Blockworks

share

Embattled crypto firms BlockFi and FTX said they have both been indirectly affected by a cybersecurity breach involving third-party claims administration platform Kroll. 

BlockFi issued a statement on Wednesday attempting to assuage concerns that its internal systems and funds had not been affected by the breach that had occurred Tuesday. Kroll has reportedly confirmed unauthorized access to certain client data stored on its system.

Kroll is currently serving as the claims agent in the bankruptcy cases of both companies, facilitating the submission and administration of debtor claims through online portals

“To be clear, BlockFi’s internal systems and client funds were not impacted,” BlockFi said in its statement. “We understand this is frustrating. In the spirit of transparency, we wanted to make our clients aware of this incident before bad actors could utilize this information to clients’ detriment.”

Defunct crypto exchange FTX announced a similar incident, which it said had occurred on Kroll’s platform and that its own system and account passwords had also not been affected.

In a post on X, formerly Twitter, FTX said non-sensitive customer data of claimants had been compromised. Kroll has since taken measures to contain and remediate the incident, per the statement.

“Kroll is notifying affected individuals directly with measures that customers can take to protect themselves,” FTX said.

FTX collapsed late last year following allegations it had misappropriated customer funds through sister trading firm Alameda Research. BlockFi simultaneously fell victim to a liquidity crunch following its exposure to FTX through loans made to Alameda as well as funds trapped on FTX.

BlockFi is attempting to foil efforts by FTX, as well as former Singapore-based hedge fund firm Three Arrows Capital, over claims to billions of dollars they say are owed to them by the former crypto lender.

Both companies advised clients Thursday to remain vigilant for attempted fraud, phishing attempts and scam emails impersonating parties connected to the security breaches.

BlockFi also warned of an expected uptick in spam phone calls and phishing attempts against other bankrupt crypto firms in the weeks and months ahead.

FTX and BlockFi said they were monitoring the situation. Blockworks attempted to contact Kroll but has so far received no response.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 24 - 26, 2026

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Research Report Templates (3).png

Research

South Korea is emerging as one of the most important global hubs for regulated digital assets, and Upbit sits at the center of this shift. Naver’s proposed acquisition could create the country’s dominant super app for payments, trading, and digital finance. This report breaks down the numbers, the regulatory tailwinds, the economics of the deal, and why the merger may unlock one of the most attractive asymmetries in Korea’s public markets.

article-image

Lido unveils a new buyback plan while BTC treasury companies slip below mNAV — can either model can truly return value?

article-image

If financial nihilism has driven you into memecoins, zero-day options, and sports betting, consider financial optimism instead

article-image

A new Sui-based protocol promises to unlock Bitcoin’s idle liquidity and eliminate wrapped-token risk

article-image

Could blockchain rails finally realize Ted Nelson’s non-linear, pro-creator “docuverse”?

article-image

What does Uniswap’s proposal to activate protocol fees and unify incentives mean for UNI token holders?

article-image

A recent mistrial illustrates how juries need more background information when it comes to judging complex systems like Ethereum