Hong Kong Court Recognizes Crypto as Property

Crypto has been classed as property in Hong Kong during a case regarding digital assets still held by defunct exchange Gatecoin

article-image

zhu difeng/Shutterstock, modified by Blockworks

share

Hong Kong’s High Court has deemed crypto to be property, marking the first time such a decision regarding digital assets has been made in the city-state.

The landmark ruling was handed down in a legal matter involving Gatecoin Limited, a crypto exchange that operated domestically from January 2015 until its demise four years later.

Gatecoin (not to be confused with Gate.io) had been instructed to cease operations and undergo liquidation after failing to retrieve funds lost in a disagreement with a payment services provider.

Following its closure in March 2019, Gatecoin’s liquidators sought court guidance on whether the crypto still held by Gatecoin belonged to customers “on trust” or could be made available to general creditors.

On trust refers to crypto held for the benefit of specific customers in the event of liquidation. In Gatecoin’s case, the crypto would be in a fiduciary capacity where the exchange is responsible for the custody and management before being returned.

While Justice Linda Chan determined that creditors’ funds on the exchange weren’t held on trust, her ruling found that crypto inherently has all the qualities of property, per domestic law firm Hogan Lovells.

Chan’s ruling also means crypto is legally capable of being held on trust, Hogan Lovells added.

Hong Kong’s definition of “property” is inclusive and intended to have a wide meaning, Chan reportedly said following the handing down of her ruling.

“The confirmation that holdings of cryptocurrencies constitute ‘property’ that is on a par with other intangible assets such as stocks and shares, brings Hong Kong into line with other common law jurisdictions,” Hogan Lovells said.

The US Internal Revenue Service also considers crypto to be property, although other regulatory agencies classify it differently according to their purview (the Securities and Exchange Commission considers many to be securities while the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network instead treats companies handling digital assets as “money transmitters”).

Hong Kong’s property ruling, meanwhile, comes as the city-state aims to revive its image as a digital assets hub.

Clara Chan, Hong Kong central bank executive director, said during the region’s recent Web3 Festival conference: “We don’t want to stifle financial innovation but level the playing field among participants to unlock the potential for the industry. We look forward to harnessing Web3 for the force of good.”


Don’t miss the next big story – join our free daily newsletter.

Tags

Upcoming Events

MON - WED, MARCH 18 - 20, 2024

Digital Asset Summit (DAS) is returning March 2024. What you can expect: And more! Don’t miss out on the opportunity to be in the room when the future of crypto is decided. Join us and help shape the future of our […]

recent research

Research report - cover graphics-2.jpg

Research

Base has doubled-down on its commitment to the Superchain vision, has shown early signs of success with nearly $400M in TVL, and has become home to novel dapps such as friend.tech which has seen significant traction.

article-image

Certain creditors could be repaid sooner, with one hedge fund exec telling Blockworks it expects a payout by the end of the year

article-image

Busan is South Korea’s second largest city with a population around 3.4 million

article-image

Cyprus granted eToro crypto registration, setting the groundwork for the company to operate crypto services post-MiCa rollout

article-image

Sponsored

These are the best tools and practices you can leverage to defend against crypto market volatility

article-image

The agency alleges around 1,160 customers used the margin product, losing about $8.35 million since Oct. 2021.

article-image

On Thursday, the Securities and Futures Commission issued a statement disavowing any communication with JPEX saying that the platform is unlicensed