Is crypto still early in the cycle?

Empire’s Jason Yanowitz thinks that we could actually be earlier in the cycle if you put aside Strategy’s bitcoin buys

article-image

Adobe and Stock Catalog/"Bitcoin and cryptocurrency" (CC license) modified by Blockworks

share


This is a segment from the Empire newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe.


If there’s one question I’m starting to hear it’s this: Have we topped?

I jokingly responded to Bitwise’s Ryan Rasmussen that I didn’t want TRUMP to be the top, and I stand by that. I’m admittedly, perhaps wishfully, hoping that we don’t top till later this year. 

Loading Tweet..

It sounds like Empire’s Jason Yanowitz was on the same page but the “funky” price actions led to a theory for him. Strategy, the firm formerly known as MicroStrategy, has propped up the price of bitcoin. 

Without the $20 billion-plus spending spree that Michael Saylor’s company went on throughout the end of last year into this year, we’d have bitcoin at a far lower price. 

Here’s the catch: Yanowitz thinks that puts us earlier in the cycle. And his theory’s backed up by Dan Matuszewski of CMS Holdings.

Loading Tweet..

As Yanowitz explained in the Round Up this morning, we haven’t seen enough venture capital yet, it’s “very PvP.”

“I don’t know why this is different this time around or if I’m just off on where we are in the cycle but my guess is the overhang of 2021 is still with us. Liquid basically doesn’t exist and therefore can’t materially drive flows or collect inflows and venture remains the big yardstick for alts,” Matuszewski wrote.

Santiago Santos noted that we need to see “more flows coming in,” and that we haven’t see that yet outside of a “selective” few. 

Are we there yet might be the next question we start asking as we debate the top. No matter where we are in the cycle, though, we should acknowledge that we’re in the early days of this new administration and one can only imagine that some of their actions will act as a catalyst moving forward.

And now you know.

Speaking of the regulatory environment, I listened to the Operation Chokepoint 2.0 hearing held on Capitol Hill yesterday. 

None of it, admittedly, was as interesting as the court transcript generously shared by Coinbase’s Paul Grewal, but if there was one takeaway by all parties involved, I’d say that everyone seemed ready to move on. 

I, too, hope we can move forward and get some answers on what happened and why. In case you need a refresher: Operation Chokepoint 2.0 was carried out by regulators, including the FDIC, to debank or prevent crypto companies from being able to bank with traditional institutions. 

Admittedly, I was skeptical initially on how much of this was intentional versus just the fault of vague or nonexistent regulations but there’s enough hard proof now, including in the aforementioned court transcripts, to show that there was intention. 

If you want the TLDR but still want to get some of the spiciest bits from the transcript, I’d recommend checking out Scott Johnsson’s thread below.

Loading Tweet..

Grewal was a witness in the hearing alongside WSPN USA CEO Austin Campbell and Better Markets Banking Policy Director Shayna Olesiuk.

Campbell, at one point, told lawmakers that regulators decided to debank crypto firms just because of some bad actors (cough cough FTX amongst others). And Grewal argued that the targeting of digital asset firms “discourages” banks from even trying to bank companies in the space. 

“What we saw in the documents that were produced yesterday, case after case, when the bank stepped forward and raised their hands and asked for permission to offer basic services, they were either ignored or they were given detailed examination and re-examination and re-examination until they simply gave up,” Grewal said.

While we’re in friendlier waters, I think it’s fair to say that we need to see some changes — beyond the changing of the guard at the FDIC — before we can fully say we’re past Operation Chokepoint 2.0.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Old Billingsgate

Mon - Wed, October 13 - 15, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Research Report Templates (20).png

Research

The dynamic between Ethena, Pendle and Aave exhibits a mutually-beneficial relationship, where the offerings of each business grows the top lines of every party in this exchange. Pendle sits at the intersection of YBA issuers (Ethena) and money markets (Aave), demonstrating heightened utilization rates of YBAs, where the PTs then exhibit profound utilization as collateral. YBA issuers see Pendle as a premier go-to-market venue, often underwriting incentives for liquidity on the market and solving for Pendle’s supply side, while money markets view PTs as attractive collateral types to lend against, solving for Pendle’s demand side. PTs represent a highly profitable collateral listing for Aave, with depositors maxing out the available borrow capacity. Pendle’s recent launch of Boros may now present the most material growth vector beyond what is currently exhibited on V2 markets, offering the ability to price yield, spreads, and duration risk across various points in time out into the future.

article-image

Airlines defend their rewards moat, Binance courts favor over breakfast, DAT fees pile up and systematic thinking

article-image

ETF flows slow, REV stagnates, Pump strikes back and Drift punches up

article-image

We’re beginning to price in the chance of not just a 25 basis point cut, but a 50 bps one

article-image

Does Circle’s Arc threaten Ethereum’s “stablecoin chain” moat, or does EVM gravity pull flows back anyway?

article-image

Tech giant’s part in long-term HPC agreement gives it “more financial certainty” than other deals, consulting firm exec argues

article-image

The new SVM chain Zink uses zk tech and promises universal account profiles