Tether receives ‘constrained’ assessment from S&P Global

Four of the eight stablecoins initially assessed were knocked back by “negative adjustments,” S&P told Blockworks

article-image

S&P and Adobe modified by Blockworks

share

The S&P Global Ratings unveiled its stablecoin stability assessment on Tuesday.

The launch looked at Dai (DAI), First Digital USD (FDUSD), Tether (USDT), Frax (FRAX), TrueUSD (TUSD) and USD Coin (USDC).

In order to assess the stablecoins, analysts primarily looked at the “quality of the assets backing the stablecoin.” Overall quality is measured by the custody risks, credit and market value. 

Read more: Tether is ‘unfairly maligned,’ but will eventually fail, says Nic Carter

Regulation, governance, supervision, liquidity, redeemability and technology are also measured, and “contributed to those stablecoins with lower assessments,” S&P said in a press release.

USDC, USDP and GUSD top the list, all receiving strong assessments. USDT, DAI and FDUSD were middle of the road or “constrained,” with evaluations that put them towards the weaker end. 

On the other hand, FRAX and TUSD are weak.

None of the stablecoins listed in the first assessment received a “very strong” evaluation, which is the highest grade.

S&P Global Ratings senior director Mohamed Damak told Blockworks that “out of the 8 stablecoins that we assessed, four were subject to a negative adjustment.”

The assessments are just that, Damak emphasized, they are not ratings of the stablecoins.

Read more: Circle’s liquidity coverage is about double US banks, chief economist says

“The consistent feedback was that the market has no transparency or insight into the inherent risks of the different stablecoins. Although the market is concentrated, as the DeFi ecosystem grows, we foresee a rising universe of coins and use cases,” Damak said.

Since the approach is applicable to many stablecoins — not just the above eight — S&P may expand its assessment in the future.

Outside of stablecoins, S&P is watching the digital assets sector with an eye on “operational and legal risk, blockchain oracle risk, crypto regulation and digital bonds.”


Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

Explore the growing intersection between crypto, macroeconomics, policy and finance with Ben Strack, Casey Wagner and Felix Jauvin. Subscribe to the Forward Guidance newsletter.

Get alpha directly in your inbox with the 0xResearch newsletter — market highlights, charts, degen trade ideas, governance updates, and more.

The Lightspeed newsletter is all things Solana, in your inbox, every day. Subscribe to daily Solana news from Jack Kubinec and Jeff Albus.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 18 - 20, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

Brooklyn, NY

TUES - THURS, JUNE 24 - 26, 2025

Permissionless IV serves as the definitive gathering for crypto’s technical founders, developers, and builders to come together and create the future.If you’re ready to shape the future of crypto, Permissionless IV is where it happens.

recent research

Research Report Templates.png

Research

An overview of the Base Ecosystem, with a focus on market leaders.

article-image

Although bitcoin hitting $120k by year’s end is looking unlikely

article-image

About 270 million HYPE has been claimed, valued around $7.6 billion

article-image

Stanford professors David Mazières and Dan Boneh will lead the lab alongside a cohort of graduate student researchers

article-image

With more companies holding BTC, bitcoin yielding strategies could become “a new corporate finance norm,” CoinShares posed

article-image

The proposal comes after Polygon governance considered a controversial use of bridged liquidity for yield

article-image

Can the community balance its decentralized ethos with the need for inclusivity and constructive debate?