Yearn Finance Exploit Points to Dangers of Old Smart Contracts

Damage from the $11.6 million exploit appears contained to original version of DeFi protocol’s permissionless vaults

article-image

Source: Shutterstock / Ivan Babydov, modified by Blockworks

share

DeFi stalwart Yearn Finance was the target of a dizzyingly complex attack early Thursday that resulted in a roughly $11.6 million stablecoin haul for the culprit. 

But the root cause dates back over three years, to a version of the savings protocol that has long since been officially abandoned.

At least $8 million in stablecoins remains in the hacker’s control, most of which has been swapped to DAI, with the remaining millions exchanged for ether (ETH) and partially passed to crypto mixer Tornado Cash in an effort to obfuscate its origin.

Yearn’s YFI governance token initially fell by roughly 5% on the news, but remains up nearly 80% year-to-date, data from CoinGecko shows.

Yearn’s official Twitter confirmed the exploit, noting that the affected vault is “an immutable contract predating YFI, [that] was deprecated in 2020.”

The attacker was able to take advantage of a vulnerability in the deployment of one of the early Yearn vaults involving tether (USDT) deposits, which receive a Yearn-equivalent token yUSDT, according to security researchers Otter Sec, samczsun and Peckshield.

Using starting capital of just 10,000 USDT, the perpetrator was able to mint over 1.2 quadrillion yUSDT and then swap those for other stablecoins via Curve Finance to extract a total of $11.6 million.

Loading Tweet..

The attack vector is linked to an apparent oversight from February 2020, when the yUSDT token contract was deployed with a bug. 

Loading Tweet..

The detail identified by Samczsun regarding an apparent “misconfiguration” is notable, according to Ernesto Garcia, Smart Contract Engineer at OpenZeppelin.

“It seems weird to me that the Fulcrum iUSDC address is hard-coded,” Garcia told Blockworks. “If the contract went through a review, it was either an oversight (everyone assuming the correct address), or might’ve been changed before deployment as some tweets out there suggest.”

Garcia suggested that bytecode verification against the audited code from the time would determine whether there was any deliberate tampering.

Aside from the age of the bug, the execution of this attack required multiple steps, three different DeFi protocols, including Aave and a flash loan.

Diagram of the flow of funds; Source: Peckshield

Aave itself is unaffected, meaning its users are not at risk, according to Peckshield, nor are users of more recent Yearn vaults.

The unknown attacker converted $1.2 million USDT to 621 ETH, and used exploited TUSD stablecoin as collateral in Aave V2 to borrow a further 320 ETH ($640,000). Much of that ether has been deposited into the Tornado Cash 100 ETH anonymity set, blockchain records show.

A separate wallet linked to the first received over 4.7 million DAI and 2.5 million USDC, with the latter swapped to DAI, where it remains as of 9:30 am ET.

Hackers prefer DAI and ETH over USDC and USDT because the centralized stablecoins from Circle and Tether are more easily frozen, preventing further transfer.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Old Billingsgate

Mon - Wed, October 13 - 15, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Research Report Templates (20).png

Research

The dynamic between Ethena, Pendle and Aave exhibits a mutually-beneficial relationship, where the offerings of each business grows the top lines of every party in this exchange. Pendle sits at the intersection of YBA issuers (Ethena) and money markets (Aave), demonstrating heightened utilization rates of YBAs, where the PTs then exhibit profound utilization as collateral. YBA issuers see Pendle as a premier go-to-market venue, often underwriting incentives for liquidity on the market and solving for Pendle’s supply side, while money markets view PTs as attractive collateral types to lend against, solving for Pendle’s demand side. PTs represent a highly profitable collateral listing for Aave, with depositors maxing out the available borrow capacity. Pendle’s recent launch of Boros may now present the most material growth vector beyond what is currently exhibited on V2 markets, offering the ability to price yield, spreads, and duration risk across various points in time out into the future.

article-image

If fear moves markets, there could be more all-time highs to come

article-image

Ether-focused BitMine Immersion saw its daily trading volumes surge this week

article-image

From Ronin’s classic L2 pivot to Taiko’s based rollup and Puffer’s ultra-low-latency appchain testnet, Ethereum-aligned architectures are multiplying

article-image

The Gemini Wallet and Onchain hub are great for total beginners, but have a lot of room to grow

article-image

Airlines defend their rewards moat, Binance courts favor over breakfast, DAT fees pile up and systematic thinking