Bitcoin Mining Execs Make Serious Bank Versus Other Industries

Riot Blockchain shareholders refused to award five bitcoin mining executives with a $90 million compensation package, despite the board

article-image

Source: Shutterstock

share
  • VanEck found Bitcoin mining companies reward their executives far more than the US’ largest companies
  • Riot Blockchain’s shareholders voted against an advisory vote on executive compensation in July

A recent shareholder vote to reject a major Riot Blockchain advisory vote on executive compensation hints at a potentially high-risk trend across the bitcoin mining industry.

Riot’s shareholders, in a rustic example of TradFi (traditional finance) governance, are allowed to vote on various decisions related to how the bitcoin mining company is run.

An 8-K filing shows Riot’s annual general meeting held on July 27 saw stockholders approve a number of proposals: electing a new director in Hubert Marleau; ratification of independent auditor Marcum LLP; and approval of an amendment to the 2019 equity incentive plan. 

But shareholders didn’t agree with the board’s unanimous recommendation urging them to vote in favor of a “say-on-pay” proposal, noted VanEck analysts, which would’ve paid out more than $90 million to five Riot executives.

CEO Jason Les and executive chairman Benjamin Yi were slated to receive about $21 million each. Even the lowest paid executive, general counsel William Jackman, was in line for a $13 million remuneration. Meanwhile, the annual bonuses were left blank, suggesting payments down the line.

The motion was designed to retain talent and ensure the achievement of long-term strategic goals. 

VanEck’s head of digital assets research Matthew Sigel and product analyst Naomi Zimmermann then decided to zoom out from Riot and check compensation at other major mining firms.

The analysts found bitcoin miners collectively paid “enormous” awards to named executive officers (NEOs), relative to the energy and IT industries and companies listed in the Russell 3000. The analysts also described Riot’s and its competitors’ compensation habits as “risky.”

The IT industry counted median total direct compensation of $2.2 million in 2022, according to VanEck. Riot other crypto mining companies paid out median compensation of $10.8 million — 390% more than the IT sector.

Image source: VanEck

“These more excessive executive compensation practices (amongst RIOT and its peers) might lead to pressure on peer companies in the digital assets industry to provide similarly large awards, in the absence of shareholder pushback,” VanEck’s analysts wrote.

“Seeing eight-to-nine figure sums for the leaders of firms that have yet to make a profit may be discomforting in any industry.” Blockworks has reached out to Riot for comment.

VanEck expects increased awareness of the environmental impact of bitcoin mining to draw attention to executive compensatory standards for the industry and other governance matters.

Riot, which has a market capitalization of over $1 billion, counts Vanguard, Blackrock, Morgan Stanley and Mirae Asset Global Investments among its top institutional holders.

The miner’s shares have plunged nearly 70% so far this year, and are down about 4% in the last month to $7.04 per share, data from TradingView shows.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Old Billingsgate

Mon - Wed, October 13 - 15, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Research Report Templates (20).png

Research

The dynamic between Ethena, Pendle and Aave exhibits a mutually-beneficial relationship, where the offerings of each business grows the top lines of every party in this exchange. Pendle sits at the intersection of YBA issuers (Ethena) and money markets (Aave), demonstrating heightened utilization rates of YBAs, where the PTs then exhibit profound utilization as collateral. YBA issuers see Pendle as a premier go-to-market venue, often underwriting incentives for liquidity on the market and solving for Pendle’s supply side, while money markets view PTs as attractive collateral types to lend against, solving for Pendle’s demand side. PTs represent a highly profitable collateral listing for Aave, with depositors maxing out the available borrow capacity. Pendle’s recent launch of Boros may now present the most material growth vector beyond what is currently exhibited on V2 markets, offering the ability to price yield, spreads, and duration risk across various points in time out into the future.

article-image

Ether-focused BitMine Immersion saw its daily trading volumes surge this week

article-image

From Ronin’s classic L2 pivot to Taiko’s based rollup and Puffer’s ultra-low-latency appchain testnet, Ethereum-aligned architectures are multiplying

article-image

The Gemini Wallet and Onchain hub are great for total beginners, but have a lot of room to grow

article-image

Airlines defend their rewards moat, Binance courts favor over breakfast, DAT fees pile up and systematic thinking

article-image

ETF flows slow, REV stagnates, Pump strikes back and Drift punches up