HyperLiquid faced a ‘tough situation’: Blockworks Research

Blockworks Research analyst Boccaccio explains the HyperLiquid controversy and why they need to adjust risk and margin

article-image

Blockworks Research Analyst Boccaccio | DAS 2025 New York by Mike Lawrence for Blockworks

share

This is a segment from the Empire newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe.


Let’s talk about HyperLiquid. 

To recap: A trader took out a relatively large short position on JELLY, then, when the short position was liquidated, HyperLiquid’s vault, HLP, took on the position to wind it down. That’s according to Blockworks Research Analyst Boccaccio.

However, JELLY kept rising, which led to the HLP taking losses, so the team overrode the oracle price — a controversial move — and closed the position. 

The choice to shut the position was perhaps a wise one, despite the controversy. Because then both OKX and Binance listed JELLY futures — a move that Boccaccio called “shady.” While we don’t know exactly what the motives were to list the futures, it was clear that HyperLiquid was struggling at the time, and this context “made it seem like an attack on HyperLiquid.”

“Notably, HyperLiquid is the only DEX that has been able to compete with CEX volumes,” Boccaccio told me. 

Loading Tweet..

We’re not going to get too into the weeds about the DEX vs. CEX debate or some of the other controversy that’s arisen since, though I know my colleagues at 0xResearch have been closely following this. 

However, the nuance of the situation is pretty important.

“All positions on Hyperliquid are onchain (unlike some other DEXs). The oracle price being overriden was decided by the validator set. This was clearly a nuanced situation, so the team had to take some serious, and potentially controversial action (even though it was decided by the validator),” Boccaccio noted.

“It’s a tough situation: Either let people lose money in the HLP and erode confidence, or close somebody’s position by overriding the oracle price. I think, to an extent, you want your money in a semi-controlled environment, where there aren’t nefarious actors taking advantage of the situation at the expense of your funds/users.”

So, HyperLiquid and HLP will need to adjust both the risk and margin moving forward to try to prevent another similar situation, Boccaccio said. 

But is it anything like what happened at FTX, like BitGet’s Gracy Chen tried to claim? Let’s not kid ourselves.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 24 - 26, 2026

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Flying_Tulip.png

Research

Flying Tulip's perpetual put option provides real principal protection, but investors must pay a valuation premium today for products that have to be built over the next 24 months. This structure works best as a stablecoin substitute where the put allows continuous monitoring—accept opportunity cost in exchange for asymmetric upside if the team executes on its ambitious cross-collateral architecture.

article-image

As flows consolidate and volatility fades, finding edge now means knowing which games are still worth playing

article-image

Value distribution came to $1.9 billion distributed in Q3, though total revenues have yet to beat 2021 heights

article-image

MegaETH public sale auction ends tomorrow, and the free money machine has attracted people who like free money

article-image

With tBTC under the hood, Acre abstracts bridging and converts non-BTC rewards to bitcoin

article-image

Accountable is also eyeing mid-November for mainnet launch

article-image

“Adjusted for size, I think it may be the most successful ETP launch of all time,” Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan says