Nansen defends its Avalanche research after Crypto Leaks’ accusations

Crypto Leaks claims Nansen’s “glowing” coverage of Avalanche is influenced by a business relationship with Ava Labs

article-image

Vector-3D/Shutterstock, modified by Blockworks

share

Crypto Leaks is once again probing industry shortcomings, this time scrutinizing blockchain analytics company Nansen for alleged flawed research.

The publication alleged that Nansen released favorable reviews on the Avalanche blockchain, even though their blockchain analytics suggest that much of the protocol’s activity is actually generated by automated bots.

In an Aug. 29 report, Crypto Leaks quoted Marcel Buen, a senior Nansen leader, stating he would not invest in Avalanche due to “the fact that most of the traction was faked and centered around a very few users.”

Crypto Leaks further alleged that Nansen’s “glowing” coverage of Avalanche stems from a business relationship with Ava Labs, the for-profit company behind the protocol. They characterized Avalanche as a “copy of Ethereum,” but with a faster proof-of-stake consensus system.

Nansen engineer questions Avalanche’s true user base

Crypto Leaks published videos of its discussion with Marcel Buen from Nansen, who oversees the firm’s technical blockchain analytics functions.

Buen is seen pointing out discrepancies in Avalanche’s reported activity, noting that much of it was actually taking place on a standalone blockchain — or subnet — that housed tokens for a play-to-earn Web3 game called Crabada. The game has since been inexplicably shut down.

He also expresses uncertainty about Avalanche’s user base.

“I would say, looking at the user base last year, it didn’t seem very promising. I don’t know if this will work out or not,” Buen said.

“I don’t think Avalanche has shown really good traction…if you did some kind of weak analysis on who was actually on the chain, you would see that like 80% was bots playing Crabada,” he added.

The outlet further stated that Nansen’s advanced blockchain analytics platform would have easily allowed them to detect bot activity on Avalanche. 

This is because individual accounts were found generating new transactions around the clock, something unlikely for real human users who need to sleep.

Despite knowing that bots were driving most of the activity on Avalanche, Crypto Leaks said they continued to portray the blockchain as a “fantastic investment opportunity.”

Data from Nansen indicates that the daily active addresses on the Avalanche C-chain ranged between 25,000 and 117,000 in the second quarter this year.

A Nansen spokesperson hit back at the Crypto Leaks report, stating that the remarks from the Nansen engineer were selectively presented and taken out of context, as the full interview was not released.

“His commentary was focused on data and events of the past, Crabada was a 2022 trend, while the specific report from us cited was referencing Q2 2023 and focused on their C-chain, which Crabada has moved out of,” the spokesperson told Blockworks, citing a report covered by CoinDesk. 

The spokesperson added that Nansen’s analysis aims to spotlight trends and on-chain activities at specific times, rather than endorsing any protocol as an investment. Where applicable, its reports on Avalanche have pointed out declines in activity, they said.

Ava Labs didn’t return Blockworks’ request for comment by press time.

Ava Labs previously accused of faking social media accounts

In April, Crypto Leaks accused Ava Labs of deploying thousands of fake “astroturf” social media accounts to manipulate public opinion and claimed that this strategy helped the company sell their AVAX tokens, disparage competitors and deceive their community.

Last August, the outlet alleged that Ava Labs had a secret agreement with attorney Kyle Roche to undermine competitors through class-action lawsuits and divert regulatory attention. Within two months of the accusation, Roche was let go by his law firm.

Emin Gün Sirer, CEO of Ava Labs, dismissed the report as “conspiracy theory nonsense.”

Updated Aug. 31, 2023 at 9:20 am ET: Added additional context.


Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

Explore the growing intersection between crypto, macroeconomics, policy and finance with Ben Strack, Casey Wagner and Felix Jauvin. Subscribe to the On the Margin newsletter.

The Lightspeed newsletter is all things Solana, in your inbox, every day. Subscribe to daily Solana news from Jack Kubinec and Jeff Albus.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Salt Lake City, UT

MON - TUES, OCT. 7 - 8, 2024

Blockworks and Bankless in collaboration with buidlbox are excited to announce the second installment of the Permissionless Hackathon – taking place October 7-8 in Salt Lake City, Utah. We’ve partnered with buidlbox to bring together the brightest minds in crypto for […]

Salt Lake City, UT

WED - FRI, OCTOBER 9 - 11, 2024

Pack your bags, anon — we’re heading west! Join us in the beautiful Salt Lake City for the third installment of Permissionless. Come for the alpha, stay for the fresh air. Permissionless III promises unforgettable panels, killer networking opportunities, and mountains […]

recent research

AERODROME TEMPLATE.png

Research

Aerodrome is a "MetaDEX" that combines elements of various DEX primitives such as Uniswap V2 and V3, Curve, Convex, and Votium. Since its launch on Base, it has become the largest protocol by TVL with more than $495M in value locked, doubling Uniswap's Base deployment.

article-image

Also, former Valkyrie CEO lands new leadership role at Canadian investment firm Cypherpunk Holdings

article-image

This week’s biggest funding round saw Jump Trading, JPMorgan contribute to the round

article-image

Plus, a layer-1 for intellectual property is launching and Farcaster users peaked

article-image

Crypto still hasn’t shaken one of its most garish primordial tails — funny stories about fraud

article-image

Plus, publicly traded crypto companies had a pretty eventful news week

article-image

Committee members directed more questions to Christy Goldsmith Romero, who could soon be leading one of the more troubled federal agencies