No Crypto Clarity Because Regulators Thought It Would Die: Barclays Exec

How far can ‘regulation by enforcement’ go before a clear legal framework for crypto becomes a real necessity, rather than pipe dream?

article-image

David Franklin/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks

share

Formulating a legal framework for crypto has dragged on for years, with no clear end in sight. One Barclays executive reckons it’s taken so long because regulators figured digital assets would simply die out.

The lack of tailored rules has led the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to target crypto via “regulation by enforcement,” rather than establishing clear guidelines, industry figures have said.

In fact, US agencies ramped up crypto enforcement efforts over the past 10 months in light of the sudden collapses of prominent firms such as Celsius, Voyager and FTX. Regulators have often filed enforcement actions against firms after they’d filed for bankruptcy, leaving users (and their funds) stranded.

Some policymakers allowed the market to “do what it wanted to do because they thought it would essentially die,” Nicole Sandler, head of digital policy at Barclays, said recently at a London fintech conference per Decrypt.

“And it hasn’t died, it’s grown, it’s grown, it’s grown.”

Sandler was part of a 2016 discussion around the legal framework for digital assets with the European Commission. She acknowledged that the industry was still in its early stages back then, but noted that wasn’t why regulators had since avoided establishing rules.

“It wasn’t that it was nascent and they couldn’t regulate it, it was a choice to see where the market went,” Sandler said. “And now they know that they have to regulate it. But the problem is regulation takes a long time from start to finish.”

More recently, three top US banking agencies, including the Federal Reserve, said that risks relating to the crypto sector mustn’t spill over into the banking system. They warned that institutions issuing or holding digital assets “is highly likely to be inconsistent with safe and sound banking practices.”

Separately, the SEC slapped Coinbase with a Wells notice, alleging violations of federal securities law. Days later, Binance was sued by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission for alleged evasion of trading and derivatives rules.

The SEC has dished out upwards of $2.6 billion in fines to crypto startups since 2013, while a lengthy SEC court battle with Ripple looks destined to define how crypto is regulated moving forward.


Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Salt Lake City, UT

WED - FRI, OCTOBER 9 - 11, 2024

Pack your bags, anon — we’re heading west! Join us in the beautiful Salt Lake City for the third installment of Permissionless. Come for the alpha, stay for the fresh air. Permissionless III promises unforgettable panels, killer networking opportunities, and mountains […]

recent research

Screen Shot 2024-05-16 at 14.53.45.png

Research

Loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR) is arguably Ethereum DeFi’s biggest problem, and thus reducing LVR is fundamental to the success of Ethereum. This report dives into the world of LVR. We uncover its importance for AMM designers, discuss the two major mechanism design categories and various projects developing solutions, and offer a higher level perspective on the importance of AMMs in general.

article-image

The courts adjourned the trials against Binance and Tigran Gambaryan until May 22 and May 23

article-image

Industry players have started realizing high-performance computing-related revenues as they buy Nvidia GPUs and secure customer deals

article-image

Yesterday saw Congress’ upper chamber side with the House on a measure aimed at overturning SAB 121

article-image

Oklahoma’s new crypto bill will go into effect in November of this year

article-image

The deposits hit a $20 million cap in just 45 minutes

article-image

Twelve Democratic Senators voted in favor to pass the resolution Thursday