WETH FUD Is All a Joke, ETH Withdrawals Still a Priority

Wrapped ether is not like wrapped bitcoin, there are no “concerns” over Ethereum’s “solvency,” and staked ether withdrawals remain a high priority

article-image

Source: Shutterstock.com

share

Crypto pros like to have a laugh, sometimes at neophytes’ expense. But when the joke is obscure enough — in this case wrapped ether memes — it can have real consequences.

Over the weekend, crypto Twitter was alight with riffs on the wave of insolvencies that have plagued the industry, by pretending that wrapped ether (WETH) was somehow a risk to Ethereum. Spoiler: It’s not.

But when enough otherwise serious people pile on to a meme, it can metastasize into market-moving “news.” For instance, Gnosis co-founder Martin Koeppelmann joined in the fun on Sunday.

Loading Tweet..

For crypto natives with an understanding of WETH and how ether is burned post-EIP-1559, the joke is fairly obvious.

To review: WETH is an ERC-20 version of ether that can be used in smart contracts like Uniswap. It dates back to 2017 and is not in any way like a custodial version of ether. For all intents and purposes, it is ether. As such, there’s no connection between WETH and fluctuations in the ETH burn rate due to transaction fees. Ether used as WETH is not being burned and cannot depeg.

But the joke got out of hand. Even quality crypto sources like Bloomberg were taken in. Bloomberg reported that “crypto watchers also pointed to worries about wrapped Ether, which is meant to have the same value as Ether while allowing access to more applications,” with the caveat merely that “some reports suggested the concerns stemmed from joke Twitter posts.” (They later quietly removed the offending paragraphs.)

In fact, there were no actual worries. It was 100 percent a joke from the start.

Dankrad Feist, a researcher at the Ethereum Foundation — the upcoming EIP-4844, also known as “Proto-Danksharding,” is partially named after him — found the Bloomberg fracas a bit off-putting.

Loading Tweet..

Koeppelmann also came clean, explaining the joke and why it made no literal sense in the first place.

To be abundantly clear: WETH is unruggable. It’s not like wBTC — wrapped bitcoin on Ethereum, which relies on a central custodian, BitGo, although there are plenty of misconceptions around the safety of wBTC as well. WETH can always be unwrapped to ETH on a one-to-one basis, as sure as the Ethereum network itself — it’s baked into the immutable code and there is no counterparty.

Staked ether withdrawals are the top priority

This one was less of a meme and more of a misunderstanding, but also one propagated by random folks on Twitter. The “concern” was that somehow the withdrawal of staked ether planned in the next major Ethereum upgrade, known as Shanghai, has been delayed.

That was news to Ethereum developers, such as Prysmatic Labs’ Terence Tsao, developer of the leading Ethereum proof-of-stake consensus implementation, Prysm, who tweeted that “withdrawal remains the highest priority for Prysm.”

“As core devs, our biggest responsibility today is to enable stakers to withdraw their funds as fast and as securely as possible,” he said.

The Shanghai upgrade is expected to take place roughly six months after the Merge, or around the second quarter of 2023. Some pointed to a change in the Ethereum Foundation website regarding the timeline, but the Ethereum Foundation isn’t in the business of specifying dates because they don’t control Ethereum — its development is decentralized.

The best way to keep tabs on what’s actually happening with Shanghai is to follow its progress on GitHub or tune into Ethereum core developer calls — the latest was on Nov. 24, and was summarized by Tim Beiko.

Once again, beware the memes — some observers took the opportunity to turn the entire concept of staked ether into a joke.

Loading Tweet..

Withdrawals are disabled by design until the Shanghai upgrade — this is neither new nor remotely alarming.

The moral of the story: Crypto memes happen fast. If you don’t stop to look around once in a while — or, say, are celebrating Thanksgiving weekend with your family — you could miss it.


Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

Explore the growing intersection between crypto, macroeconomics, policy and finance with Ben Strack, Casey Wagner and Felix Jauvin. Subscribe to the Forward Guidance newsletter.

Get alpha directly in your inbox with the 0xResearch newsletter — market highlights, charts, degen trade ideas, governance updates, and more.

The Lightspeed newsletter is all things Solana, in your inbox, every day. Subscribe to daily Solana news from Jack Kubinec and Jeff Albus.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 18 - 20, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

Brooklyn, NY

TUES - THURS, JUNE 24 - 26, 2025

Permissionless IV serves as the definitive gathering for crypto’s technical founders, developers, and builders to come together and create the future.If you’re ready to shape the future of crypto, Permissionless IV is where it happens.

recent research

Research Report Templates.png

Research

An overview of the Base Ecosystem, with a focus on market leaders.

article-image

Although bitcoin hitting $120k by year’s end is looking unlikely

article-image

About 270 million HYPE has been claimed, valued around $7.6 billion

article-image

Stanford professors David Mazières and Dan Boneh will lead the lab alongside a cohort of graduate student researchers

article-image

With more companies holding BTC, bitcoin yielding strategies could become “a new corporate finance norm,” CoinShares posed

article-image

The proposal comes after Polygon governance considered a controversial use of bridged liquidity for yield

article-image

Can the community balance its decentralized ethos with the need for inclusivity and constructive debate?