EU Committee Votes Down Anti-proof-of-work Clause in Crypto Bill

The clause previously sought to “effectively” ban crypto services related to proof-of-work-based coins, including bitcoin and ether

article-image

EU flags in front of European Commission in Brussels | Source: Shutterstock

share

key takeaways

  • A controverial section of the EU’s crypto draft bill has been voted down by the bloc’s economic committee
  • Voting witnessed 23 votes in favor to 30 votes against, with a further six abstaining

The EU Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) has voted against the implementation of a controversial clause that some say possessed teeth to effectively ban proof-of-work coins, including bitcoin.

ECON’s voting session on Monday witnessed 23 votes in favor of the Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) draft legislation’s clause to 30 votes against, with a further six abstaining.

Specifically, the clause sought to subject the use of the crypto industry’s proof-of-work-based digital assets to “minimum environmental sustainability standards.”

Language in the bill also included a measure to “set up and maintain a phased rollout plan to ensure compliance with such requirements.”

The wording was a revision to the bill which previously sought to establish a framework prohibiting crypto services from utilizing proof-of-work-based cryptos altogether.

Some, including Unstoppable Finance’s head of growth Patrick Hansen, viewed the language, including its revised wording, as “essentially the same” as a ban on bitcoin.

Lawmakers across the continent have been pushing for regulation on crypto mining, concerned proof-of-work is an energy-intensive crypto activity deemed “unsustainable” in light of the legislation’s aims.

Introduced in 2020, MiCA seeks to tighten regulation around digital assets by establishing a licensing regime on the continent and streamlining a uniform set of rules for the bloc’s 27 member states.

MiCA is part of the EU’s Digital Finance package that is attempting to “further enable and support the potential of digital finance in terms of innovation and competition while mitigating the risks.”


Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

Explore the growing intersection between crypto, macroeconomics, policy and finance with Ben Strack, Casey Wagner and Felix Jauvin. Subscribe to the Forward Guidance newsletter.

Get alpha directly in your inbox with the 0xResearch newsletter — market highlights, charts, degen trade ideas, governance updates, and more.

The Lightspeed newsletter is all things Solana, in your inbox, every day. Subscribe to daily Solana news from Jack Kubinec and Jeff Albus.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 18 - 20, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

Brooklyn, NY

TUES - THURS, JUNE 24 - 26, 2025

Permissionless IV serves as the definitive gathering for crypto’s technical founders, developers, and builders to come together and create the future.If you’re ready to shape the future of crypto, Permissionless IV is where it happens.

recent research

Research Report Templates.png

Research

An overview of the Base Ecosystem, with a focus on market leaders.

article-image

Although bitcoin hitting $120k by year’s end is looking unlikely

article-image

About 270 million HYPE has been claimed, valued around $7.6 billion

article-image

Stanford professors David Mazières and Dan Boneh will lead the lab alongside a cohort of graduate student researchers

article-image

With more companies holding BTC, bitcoin yielding strategies could become “a new corporate finance norm,” CoinShares posed

article-image

The proposal comes after Polygon governance considered a controversial use of bridged liquidity for yield

article-image

Can the community balance its decentralized ethos with the need for inclusivity and constructive debate?