Crypto payments to ‘high-risk’ crypto exchanges to be blocked by Aussie bank

Transfers to “high-risk” crypto exchanges will be declined, National Australia Bank has said, but only it knows exactly how that’s determined


Novikov Aleksey/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks


National Australia Bank is tightening its crypto policies in response to what it says is a growing risk of customers being scammed.

As of Tuesday, the bank said new protections decline “some transactions made to high-risk cryptocurrency exchanges.” National Australia Bank, or NAB, didn’t name which exchanges it had identified as high risk.

Fund transfers, PayID, credit and debit card transactions to those unnamed exchanges will all be declined, per the statement. Contacting the bank on the matter would not change the outcome, it said. Withdrawals from exchanges to the bank will remain unaffected.

NAB declined Blockwork’s request for further details but said its decision to block payments to “several crypto exchanges” is “consistent with broader industry actions in reducing “scam-related crypto payments.”

“We have introduced these blocks where we identify a high proportion of payments going towards scams,” said Chris Sheehan, NAB’s head of group investigations and fraud business unit.

Should customers find transactions to crypto exchanges blocked, NAB advised contacting the firm in question to determine what alternative payment methods are available to them.

“We are doing this to try and keep our customers safe from scams,” NAB said. “We’ll continue to monitor fraud and scams in relation to cryptocurrency exchanges, including the impact of the changes made and may make further changes in the future if required.”

Another bank just set monthly limits on crypto exchange deposits

NAB joins major rivals Commonwealth Bank (CBA) and Westpac in crypto policy they all say is aimed at protecting consumers from scams and other risks. 

CBA introduced a 10,000 Australian dollar ($6,811) monthly limit for cash sent to crypto exchanges last month. Smaller banks and credit unions have yet to implement similar policies.

Industry proponents say the banks’ actions restrict economic freedom. Both Commonwealth Bank and Westpac did not immediately return a request for comment.

Local exchange Swyftx told Blockworks the impact of CBA’s deposit limits led to a 50% spike in false positives for fraud, which made tackling real fraud more difficult.

Swyftx said it has not yet been affected by NAB’s decision, and customers have so far been able to transact using their Commbank and Westpac accounts.

“Some exchanges clearly have to do a lot better on scams and security. But banks need to be careful with industry-wide restrictions because they don’t solve the underlying problem,” Jason Titman, Swyftx’s chief operating officer, said.

He said it made “no sense” for banks to target the entirety of customer payments at “well-run” platforms, where almost all transactions are legitimate.

“While we appreciate the banks are conscious of their corporate responsibilities, crypto is continuing to gain legitimate use cases,” Titman said. “This approach actually hurts the banks’ customers they say they are trying to protect.”

News analysis by David Canellis

Tightening crypto rules under the guise of consumer protection has become tradition for institutions around the world. 

It’s easy to lump this Australian bank in with the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, Financial Action Task Force and the Federal Reserve — all of which have broad brushed crypto to be overrun with scams and fraud.

Stopping customers from becoming fraud victims is a noble goal. And there is no shortage of crypto scams out there, including phony trading platforms and dodgy brokers.

It’s true that crypto exchanges sometimes list cryptocurrencies with little legitimate value — many of which could be considered scams depending on how broad the definitions. Low-quality venues with poor liquidity should generally be avoided.

But NAB is being frustratingly vague here. Is it clamping down on fraudulent venues that list too many memecoins? What about crypto exchanges that unknowingly list rug pulls — will NAB cut them off from their users?

NAB’s opaque rules give little insight into their effectiveness. NAB customers may very well be getting scammed, and the bank could simply be retaining flexibility to cut off any crypto-related entity they please.

The bank should know crypto is a response to exactly that kind of unilateral power over people’s money. A whole industry built around undermining that power. NAB, CBA and other Aussie banks may want to rethink how they communicate with the ecosystem. 

Retaining trust will only become more difficult as the relevance of legacy finance fades in favor of crypto over the next few decades. Transparency is the only way.

Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

The Lightspeed newsletter is all things Solana, in your inbox, every day. Subscribe to daily Solana news from Jack Kubinec and Jeff Albus.


Upcoming Events

Salt Lake City, UT

WED - FRI, OCTOBER 9 - 11, 2024

Pack your bags, anon — we’re heading west! Join us in the beautiful Salt Lake City for the third installment of Permissionless. Come for the alpha, stay for the fresh air. Permissionless III promises unforgettable panels, killer networking opportunities, and mountains […]

recent research

Screenshot 2024-05-23 091855.png


Bitcoin L2s aim to boost scalability while preserving decentralization and security, unlocking a better user experience, and new avenues for Bitcoin-powered innovations. However, no existing Bitcoin L2 leverages the full security of Bitcoin.


Also, toncoin could be crypto’s next blue-chip token


I believe that the innovation happening on Bitcoin right now is what will ultimately lead to a better Bitcoin for everyone


The payments firm is exploring PYUSD’s payments use cases


Planned funds would not stake their holdings, which some say will hurt the ETFs’ appeal for certain investors


Solana validators voted in favor of a proposal that would send 100% of priority fees to validators


In November, an iteration of the survey found that 34% of respondents were paying attention to crypto, but that figure has since jumped to 41%