Exodus Raises $59M, Mostly From Retail Investors

$75 million in shares were listed, priced at $27.42 each, but Exodus only accepted payment in bitcoin, ethereum or USD coin.

article-image

Exodus founders JP Richardson (left) and Daniel Castagnoli; Source: Exodus

share
  • Exodus has raised about $59 million since April 8 via a Regulation A sale
  • 92% of raised capital came from non-accredited investors

Crypto wallet provider Exodus has raised about $59 million in five days, almost entirely from non-accredited retail investors. 

The Delaware-based firm began selling stock on April 8 as part of a regulated public offering approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission. $75 million in shares were listed, priced at $27.42 each, but Exodus only accepted payment in bitcoin, ethereum or USD coin. 

Exodus has reached about 80% of their $75 million goal from over 4,000 investors. The Regulation A sale allowed retail investors to get involved, and only 8% of capital raised so far has come from accredited investors. 

The company is currently looking into expanding the availability of shares and hopes to have the Class A common stock on trading platforms within nine months, according to a release posted Monday. 

The public offering comes at a major moment for digital assets. Crypto exchange Coinbase is set to make its Nasdaq debut via direct listing Wednesday, becoming the just major crypto company to go public in the US. Coinbase valuations are expected to be between $60 billion and $140 billion. 

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 24 - 26, 2026

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Research Report Templates (27).png

Research

Solana's spot trading landscape will remain bifurcated: prop AMMs will own the short-tail of highly liquid pairs, while passive AMMs continue drifting toward the long-tail. Both can win via vertical integration, but in opposite directions: passive AMMs are moving closer to users through token issuance platforms (e.g., Pump-PumpSwap, MetaDAO-Futarchy AMM), while prop AMMs are moving down the stack into transaction landing services and infrastructure (e.g., HumidiFi-Nozomi). The venues most at risk are legacy AMMs with limited end-user control and no durable, launch-driven source of order flow.

article-image

Some systems improve by failing — and crypto has no choice

article-image

Yield Basis introduces an IL-free AMM design that already dominates BTC DEX liquidity

article-image

Maybe tokenholders don’t need the rights that corporate shareholders have come to expect

article-image

As Hyperliquid and Lighter battle for perps DEX dominance, Boros could capture the structural upside

article-image

Investors are often right about the future, but wrong about the returns

article-image

A look back at 2025, reflections on our industry, and what it means for Blockworks in 2026