How the SEC should categorize tokens: a16z Crypto

A16z Crypto lists seven buckets for tokens and recommendations for how to regulate them, in a filing submitted to the SEC

article-image

SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce | Permissionless II for Blockworks

share

This is a segment from the Empire newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe.


The SEC has some questions, and it seems a16z might have some answers. 

In a 50-page filing, a16z addressed the newly-established Crypto Task Force, and some of the 50-page filing is filled with what you’d expect: how a16z Crypto thinks that the Howey Test should be utilized on a crypto company, their thoughts on what’s needed for a decentralized regulatory framework, and so on. 

The biggest takeaway is simple: “When control is eliminated, the application of securities laws should be limited; when control is present, traditional (but modernized) approaches should be used.”

Makes sense, right? This approach is technologically neutral while also appeasing the fact that this industry needs some regulation (a point I think we can all finally agree on). Essentially, regulators should just need to get ahead of potential risks, rather than using merit as an assessment.  

But the 50-page filing also included nuggets that don’t just apply to the SEC, and they’ve very kindly labeled categories of tokens for all of us. 

These include: Network Tokens, Security Tokens, Company-Backed Tokens, Collectible Tokens, Arcade Tokens, Asset-Backed Tokens, and Memecoins.

Admittedly, there could be more, but the a16z Crypto team noted that these are the main types they’ve seen in the space. And, honestly, they check out in my book. 

Now I know what some of you are thinking: We have a friendlier SEC. Is a filing explaining this to our very own Crypto Mother Hester Peirce really necessary? Yes. Mostly because crypto lacks the regulatory framework and legal precedents to protect the industry should non-crypto folks step back into the SEC. 

Okay, so let’s go back to the token classifications. For network tokens, the suggestion is a “control-based decentralization framework guidance” for such tokens. The requirements would separate a network from the definition of a company, allowing profit expectations to network as opposed to a more centralized entity. 

And, perhaps one of the most important tidbits: There should be guidance that properly lays out the conditions for liquidity for sales by insiders so that they differ from securities transactions. 

“Doing so could help to restrict persons that exert control over a network token from participating in secondary markets of such a token and limit their ability to act on potential information asymmetries,” thereby solving a problem that’s popped up a few times in crypto. 

Simply put, asset-backed tokens refer to stablecoins and wrapped tokens. And, well, as you saw yesterday, those are (hopefully) getting their own regulatory frameworks. A collectible token is another easy one, basically just something — like a piece of art, music, etc — that’d be protected under a safe harbor proposal. 

Along those lines, an arcade token isn’t something you can use in an actual arcade (if you can find one that’s still open), but rather a form of currency within a game or online economy. 

Company-backed tokens are linked to the company backing them (RIP FTT). And a security token is exactly what it sounds like: the digital form of a security, aka tokenization. 

Memecoins are the outlier in this list, having already gotten some regulatory clarity from the SEC when the SEC said they have no intrinsic value. At least we have that one figured out!

We’re still in the wait-and-see era of crypto: We’re finally in a friendlier environment, but the rules haven’t quite been laid out yet. Once we get clarity, I can finally stop going on and on about being patient. Aren’t you excited?


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

  • Blockworks Daily: The newsletter that helps thousands of investors understand crypto and the markets, by Byron Gilliam.
  • Empire: Start your morning with the top news and analysis to inform your day in crypto.
  • Forward Guidance: Reporting and analysis on the growing intersection of crypto and macroeconomics, policy and finance.
  • 0xResearch: Alpha directly in your inbox. Market highlights, data, degen trade ideas, governance updates, token performance and more.
  • Lightspeed: Built for Solana investors, developers and community members. The latest from one of crypto’s hottest networks.
  • The Drop: For crypto collectors and traders, covering apps, games, memes and more.
Tags

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 18 - 20, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

Industry City | Brooklyn, NY

TUES - THURS, JUNE 24 - 26, 2025

Permissionless IV serves as the definitive gathering for crypto’s technical founders, developers, and builders to come together and create the future.If you’re ready to shape the future of crypto, Permissionless IV is where it happens.

Old Billingsgate

Mon - Wed, October 13 - 15, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Unlocked by Template Presentation.jpg

Research

The Solana validator landscape has changed drastically over the past year. The chain now has 1,332 active validators with 380.9 million SOL staked (63.9% of supply) as of February 2025. Validator revenue had diversified beyond inflationary rewards (still making up 55%) to include Jito tips (30%), priority fees (24%), and base fees (<1%), in January, especially with the increased activity on Solana. Since then, issuance has become dominant again (76%), while Jito tips (14%), priority fees (9%), and base fees (less than 1%) have reduced in share of February 2025. There has been a strong shift towards non-inflationary revenue sources, which have become more central to validator economics as priority fees and off-chain blockspace auctions gain traction. Client diversity has also improved drastically, with implementations such as Agave, Jito-Solana, and Frankendancer already in use, and upcoming clients like Firedancer and Sig expected to further strengthen resilience and reduce reliance on a single codebase.

article-image

BWR analyst Carlos Gonzalez Campo explains the consequences of SOL inflation and transfers lost to “leaky buckets”

article-image

Empire co-host Santiago Santos makes the case that memecoins have actually helped push infra forward…just not in the way you think

article-image

A16z Crypto lists seven buckets for tokens and recommendations for how to regulate them, in a filing submitted to the SEC

article-image

New model aims to resolve trading inefficiencies with a single execution layer and market maker changes

article-image

Investors navigating BTC face short-term unpredictability, influence from other markets

article-image

The GENIUS Act aims to establish regulatory guidelines for stablecoins