Security Token Provider INX Cannot Relate to Coinbase’s SEC Woes

INX was the first company to conduct a tokenized initial public offering under SEC approval in 2021. Now, it’s helping others do the same

article-image

Blockworks exclusive art by axel rangel

share
  • After its successful regulated ICO, INX now works with other companies on compliance solutions
  • Coinbase’s claim that the SEC refuses to create new rules is unfounded, INX’s deputy CEO told Blockworks

As Coinbase continues its disagreement with the SEC over the proper classification of crypto assets, security token provider INX says it has been playing by the rules for years. 

INX, an exchange that facilitates regulated securities tokens listings, was founded in 2017, during the height of the initial coin offering (ICO) boom. As the new form of crowdfunding drew increased regulatory scrutiny, the company decided to adhere to stringent regulatory standards, said Itai Avneri, deputy CEO and chief operating officer.

“We made a strategic decision back then that we were going to do it in the right way,” Avneri said. “While others ran away from regulations, we went to the front door and basically came to the SEC and said that we want to do a regulated ICO.” 

INX was the first company to conduct a tokenized initial public offering under SEC approval in 2021. The platform raised $85 million from more than 7,000 retail investors. After the token offering closed, INX listed the INX security token for the secondary market on its alternative trading system, the INX Securities platform. 

Coinbase’s recent petition to the SEC to provide greater clarity around digital asset classification highlights the same issues INX has been addressing with regulators for years, Avneri said. 

The SEC alleged nine tokens (AMP, RLY, DDX, XYO, RGT, LCX, POWR, DFX and KROM) are securities and, as such, Coinbase cannot trade them without a broker-dealer license, which INX holds, Avneri said.

“[In the petition, Coinbase] said that the SEC has been unwilling to write new rules,” Avneri said. “I’m saying they’re wrong because the SEC is already working together with us.” 

The SEC’s latest complaint highlights the need for companies and projects to think critically before launching tokens, Renata Szkoda, chief financial officer of INX, said.

“It’s such a critical moment for these projects and companies to consider whether they would be considered a security or not, if that token is issued,” Szkoda said.

“Unfortunately, a lot of tokens got created and I don’t know if that consideration ever got its full deserved attention.”  

INX now works with other companies to help issue digital securities and raise capital by providing licensing, technology, marketing, compliance services and more. Last month, INX partnered with Trucpal, a digital financial and tax accounting software for the Chinese freight market, to launch a token offering. 

“I do want to stop and acknowledge how revolutionary this type of investing is for a regular investor,” Szkoda said. “It really makes the investing process much more open to general public.” 


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 24 - 26, 2026

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Research Report Templates (27).png

Research

Solana's spot trading landscape will remain bifurcated: prop AMMs will own the short-tail of highly liquid pairs, while passive AMMs continue drifting toward the long-tail. Both can win via vertical integration, but in opposite directions: passive AMMs are moving closer to users through token issuance platforms (e.g., Pump-PumpSwap, MetaDAO-Futarchy AMM), while prop AMMs are moving down the stack into transaction landing services and infrastructure (e.g., HumidiFi-Nozomi). The venues most at risk are legacy AMMs with limited end-user control and no durable, launch-driven source of order flow.

article-image

DTCC moves DTC-custodied Treasuries onchain via Canton, while Lighter’s LIT launches trading at a fees multiple in Hyperliquid territory

article-image

In the 90s, rapt audiences worldwide watched a coffee pot — will that fascination ever turn to crypto?

article-image

Some systems improve by failing — and crypto has no choice

article-image

Yield Basis introduces an IL-free AMM design that already dominates BTC DEX liquidity

article-image

Maybe tokenholders don’t need the rights that corporate shareholders have come to expect

article-image

As Hyperliquid and Lighter battle for perps DEX dominance, Boros could capture the structural upside