Solana deep dive: Unpacking proof-of-history
The encoded timekeeping system improves proof-of-stake, allowing the chain to quickly validate transactions
CryptoFX/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks
This is a segment from the Lightspeed newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe.
Imagine for a moment that you view the world financial system as one big centralized hornswoggle that benefits the few at the expense of the many — perish the thought.
Eventually, you come around to the idea that a fairer system might be possible by decentralizing authority among many independent participants. Instead of a trusted central entity validating transactions, these contributors would run their own nodes, verifying and maintaining the network through distributed consensus.
But here’s the challenge: How do you get thousands of decentralized actors — each highly incentivized to cheat for financial gain — to agree on the validity of each other’s work? If even a small group were to successfully deceive the network, confidence in the system would collapse.
Satoshi Nakamoto’s solution was proof-of-work (PoW), wherein miners repeatedly hash block data with varying nonce values, aiming to find a solution that meets specific difficulty criteria. The first to succeed gets to propose a new block and earns a reward paid in bitcoin. No one can cheat because every other node quickly verifies or rejects each block before it is added to the chain.
This system has worked pretty well for BTC, which has had some modest success (lol) in establishing itself as a globally recognized, censorship-resistant store of value. However, it’s not without its trade-offs. Bitcoin’s PoW model results in slow transaction speeds and high energy consumption. The network processes just seven transactions per second (TPS) on average, far below modern digital payment systems like Visa.
While layer-2 solutions like the Lightning Network help scale Bitcoin’s capacity, its base layer remains limited. Mining also consumes energy on the scale of entire nations, drawing criticism from environmentalists and regulators alike.
As limitations go, though, none of this has been a dealbreaker. But when Ethereum emerged with the goal of programmability via smart contracts, scaling became a much bigger issue. Executing code onchain is far more computationally intensive than executing simple transactions, and Ethereum’s base layer (before rollups) manages only 15-30 TPS, leading to congestion, high fees, and slow confirmations during peak demand.
Enter Solana’s 2017 breakthrough: proof-of-history (PoH).
PoH isn’t a consensus mechanism — it’s a cryptographic timekeeping system. Instead of validators constantly communicating to determine transaction order, PoH pre-establishes a verifiable sequence of events using continuous hashing (SHA-256) to create an immutable timeline of transactions.
Pause. I know this is a lot. The main takeaway here is that PoH theoretically allows Solana to validate 50,000 to 65,000 TPS. That’s a lot more than Bitcoin and Ethereum, y’all. Transactions settle almost instantly, making Solana one of the fastest public L1s.
The network combines PoH with proof-of-stake (PoS) to balance speed, security and decentralization. Unlike traditional PoS networks, which require validators to continuously agree on timestamps, Solana’s blockchain structure inherently encodes transaction order. That lets validators focus purely on verification and security, eliminating a major bottleneck in consensus.
Of course, PoH has its own downsides.
Its high computational demands require powerful hardware and bandwidth, meaning that only well-funded entities or data centers can efficiently run validators. While Solana’s Nakamoto coefficient (~30-40) is better than some chains, a small number of entities do control the majority of stake. This pretty inarguably undermines the network’s decentralized ethos and makes it way more susceptible to collusion.
Solana also introduces a different set of security risks due to its extreme speed. Slower blockchains process transactions in a mempool before finalization, providing more time for automated validation and anomaly detection. In contrast, high-speed chains like Solana must mitigate front-running, spam and manipulation at the protocol level rather than relying on mempool-based filtering. Solutions like stake-weighted quality of service (QoS), QUIC networking, and local fee markets have been introduced to mitigate these issues, with mostly positive results.
At the end of the day, though, Solana’s proof-of-history represents a radical shift in blockchain validation. By solving speed and scalability challenges without entirely sacrificing decentralization, it proves that blockchains can compete with traditional financial systems, making near-instant, low-cost, onchain transactions a reality.
Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:
- The Breakdown: Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily.
- 0xResearch: Alpha in your inbox. Think like an analyst.
