Stablecoins Offer ‘Efficiency and Functionality’ in Payments, Says Bank of England

“The question is not whether but how we should develop the machinery for tokenized transactions to settle in central bank money,” says Bank of England’s John Cunliffe

article-image

lazyllama/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks

share

Stablecoin use cases — specifically stablecoins for payments — were likened to the evolution of the iPhone by Bank of England Deputy Governor John Cunliffe in a recent speech.

Alongside the digital pound, which the Bank of England (BOE) is currently working on, Cunliffe said that stablecoins for payments are one of four focus areas for the BOE when it comes to digital assets. 

Stablecoins offer “the possibility of greater efficiency and functionality in payments,” according to Cunliffe. However, because they sit outside of regulations at present, there is a slim likelihood that any of the current offerings would pass the standards that an entity such as the BOE would set. 

“Systemic stablecoins will need to be backed with high quality and liquid assets to be able to meet these expectations and standards, as set out by the Financial Policy Committee,” Cunliffe said in the speech. The BOE is working on a regulatory framework that would focus on stablecoins used for payments. 

In May of last year, UK regulators proposed regulatory oversight of payment systems, such as stablecoins, where “deficiencies in its design or disruption to its operation may threaten the stability of the UK financial system” should fall under the BOE.

According to Cunliffe, there is also misunderstanding of the BOE’s approach to digital assets.

“The question is not whether but how we should develop the machinery for tokenized transactions to settle in central bank money — in other words what will provide the most efficient, effective and fastest route to this end, given our current starting point,” he said. 

The possible regulation that Cunliffe refers to is similar to what United States policymakers are working on. 

TerraUSD, an algorithmic stablecoin that was pegged to the US dollar through LUNA, infamously lost its dollar peg and collapsed, wiping out billions of dollars and starting a domino effect that would lead to the bankruptcies of Three Arrows Capital as well as crypto lenders Voyager and Celsius. 

The draft of a stablecoin regulation bill, which was published ahead of a hearing on Wednesday, April 19, showed that lawmakers appear to be on the same page as the BOE. New algorithmic stablecoins, which are based on a secondary token, would face a two-year moratorium.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 24 - 26, 2026

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Research Report Templates (3).png

Research

South Korea is emerging as one of the most important global hubs for regulated digital assets, and Upbit sits at the center of this shift. Naver’s proposed acquisition could create the country’s dominant super app for payments, trading, and digital finance. This report breaks down the numbers, the regulatory tailwinds, the economics of the deal, and why the merger may unlock one of the most attractive asymmetries in Korea’s public markets.

article-image

Lido unveils a new buyback plan while BTC treasury companies slip below mNAV — can either model can truly return value?

article-image

If financial nihilism has driven you into memecoins, zero-day options, and sports betting, consider financial optimism instead

article-image

A new Sui-based protocol promises to unlock Bitcoin’s idle liquidity and eliminate wrapped-token risk

article-image

Could blockchain rails finally realize Ted Nelson’s non-linear, pro-creator “docuverse”?

article-image

What does Uniswap’s proposal to activate protocol fees and unify incentives mean for UNI token holders?

article-image

A recent mistrial illustrates how juries need more background information when it comes to judging complex systems like Ethereum