Executive order deja-vu 

A comparison of Trump and Biden’s crypto executive orders

article-image

Former President Joe Biden and President Donald Trump | Below the Sky/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks

share


This is a segment from the Forward Guidance newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe.


President Trump yesterday issued his first crypto executive order

The news and ensuing chaos on Crypto Twitter reminded me of Biden’s crypto executive order, published in March 2022. 

Let’s take a trip down memory lane. Here’s what Trump’s report says, and how it differs from Biden’s plans: 

On CBDCs

Trump’s order prohibits federal agencies from establishing, issuing or promoting central bank digital currencies. It calls for any ongoing projects creating a CBDC to be “immediately terminated.” 

CBDCs “threaten the stability of the financial system, individual privacy and the sovereignty of the United States,” Trump’s order reads. 

Biden was less resolute on the topic. His administration struck a bit of a middle ground, saying they saw “merit” to a US CBDC but also acknowledged “potential risks and downsides to consider.” In the end, Biden directed agencies to create a report on the future of money and payment systems. 

We eventually got this report, which, like Biden’s executive order, said little definitively. The Treasury recommended “advancing” work on a CBDC and “prioritizing” improvements to cross-border payments. Spoiler alert, a CBDC was never developed. 

On “protection”

When it comes to security, Biden and Trump hold very different views on how to approach digital assets. 

Biden’s order focused on protecting consumers from the risks associated with investing and engaging with crypto. He also highlighted national security concerns, calling digital assets a threat to financial stability and a tool ripe for abuse from illicit actors. 

Trump’s EO also includes the term “protection,” but his administration is concerned with maintaining US dollar dominance and shielding citizens from the dangers of CBDCs. 

The Working Group

Trump’s order established a Working Group on Digital Asset Markets, to be led by “crypto czar” David Sacks

Included in this group are the chairs of the CFTC and SEC, attorney general and secretaries of the Treasury and Homeland Security, among other cabinet members. 

Trump’s Working Group “shall evaluate the potential creation and maintenance of a national digital asset stockpile and propose criteria for establishing such a stockpile, potentially derived from cryptocurrencies lawfully seized by the federal government through its law enforcement efforts.” 

As one source on the Hill told me last night, this is a long way of saying the “strategic bitcoin reserve is going to live in bureaucratic purgatory for a long time, maybe forever.” 

Biden did not create any such working group, or any crypto-specific advisory council. But he did task the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets to create a report outlining the various risks of digital assets. 

This report noted that crypto can pose a threat to financial stability, and it recommended Congress pass legislation designating rulemaking authority to appropriate agencies (something like a market structure bill, for example.)

Spoiler: This, too, has lived in political limbo for years. 

Only time will tell if this latest crypto executive order inspires more progress than Biden’s. 

But it’s worth noting that the industry excitement around Trump’s EO bodes well. Never underestimate what some well-funded lobbyists can get done on Capitol Hill.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Old Billingsgate

Mon - Wed, October 13 - 15, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Research Report Templates (20).png

Research

The dynamic between Ethena, Pendle and Aave exhibits a mutually-beneficial relationship, where the offerings of each business grows the top lines of every party in this exchange. Pendle sits at the intersection of YBA issuers (Ethena) and money markets (Aave), demonstrating heightened utilization rates of YBAs, where the PTs then exhibit profound utilization as collateral. YBA issuers see Pendle as a premier go-to-market venue, often underwriting incentives for liquidity on the market and solving for Pendle’s supply side, while money markets view PTs as attractive collateral types to lend against, solving for Pendle’s demand side. PTs represent a highly profitable collateral listing for Aave, with depositors maxing out the available borrow capacity. Pendle’s recent launch of Boros may now present the most material growth vector beyond what is currently exhibited on V2 markets, offering the ability to price yield, spreads, and duration risk across various points in time out into the future.

article-image

If fear moves markets, there could be more all-time highs to come

article-image

Ether-focused BitMine Immersion saw its daily trading volumes surge this week

article-image

From Ronin’s classic L2 pivot to Taiko’s based rollup and Puffer’s ultra-low-latency appchain testnet, Ethereum-aligned architectures are multiplying

article-image

The Gemini Wallet and Onchain hub are great for total beginners, but have a lot of room to grow

article-image

Airlines defend their rewards moat, Binance courts favor over breakfast, DAT fees pile up and systematic thinking