Understanding automatic market makers

The real strength of tailored AMMs might lie in their capacity to cultivate deeper loyalty and engagement within niche communities

article-image

Jack_the_sparow and Adobe modified by Blockworks

share


This is a segment from the Lightspeed newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe.


Automated market makers (AMMs) offer continuous market liquidity and decentralized trading mechanisms that make a whole host of DeFi innovations viable. Recently, a few projects — including memecoin launchpad pump.fun — have taken an interest in developing their own use case-specific AMMs, veering away from reliance on third-party platforms.

To understand this trend, we need a more intimate understanding of how AMMs work, the problems they solve, and the strategic advantage of customizing liquidity mechanisms to align  with project objectives.

AMMs remove TradFi’s order book model entirely, instead replacing the concept with liquidity pools. These are user-supplied reserves of tokens (typically equal in value within constant-product concepts) that get locked inside of smart contracts. Instead of matching buy and sell orders directly, AMMs facilitate trades using formulas that continuously determine token prices based on their relative quantities within each pool.

One of the most prevalent AMM models utilizes the constant-product market maker algorithm, expressed mathematically as x * y = k. In this markup, x and y represent the reserve balances of two tokens in the liquidity pool, while k is a constant representing the product of these reserves.

When a user conducts a trade, exchanging token x for token y (or vice versa), the quantities shift, altering the ratio of tokens in the pool. To maintain the invariant constant (k), the AMM algorithm adjusts the price dynamically, ensuring the product of the token quantities remains stable post-trade.

If it’s helpful, you can also just pretend this all happens by magic, the mechanics of which are entirely indiscernible to all but the most learned pursuers of the occult. The outcome is the same either way, with the key point being: At the end of a trade, a given liquidity pool will always remain balanced according to the AMM’s ruleset. Through the maintenance of this balance, the system preserves a continuous state of liquidity and predictable token pricing without reliance on centralized counterparties. Abracadabra. 

Of course, this model also introduces certain trade-offs. Impermanent loss for one, which can occur due to price fluctuations and alter token ratios. AMMs also typically require significant liquidity to reduce slippage (the difference between expected and executed trade prices). When a liquidity pool has limited reserves, even relatively small trades can substantially impact the token ratio, causing notable price swings during execution. 

So why would a project that is not primarily concerned with generalized token swapping want to operate its own AMM? Let’s take pump.fun as a recent for-instance. It initially employed a bonding curve mechanism for token launches, where token prices increased as more tokens were purchased. Once a token’s bonding curve was completed, it would migrate to third-party provider Raydium to facilitate all of the aforementioned AMM balderdash.

However, pump.fun has recently transitioned to its own proprietary DEX, PumpSwap, eliminating the need for migration to Raydium and the associated fees. By internalizing its AMM, pump.fun gains complete control over liquidity dynamics, and can customize incentives and trading features to match the unique speculative and meme-centric interests of its community. For users, this means a more streamlined trading experience with scaled back costs.

As Web3 platforms progress, it’s clear that some believe tailored AMMs offer competitive advantages and facilitate closer alignment of economic incentives with community-specific behaviors and objectives. Thus, the real strength of tailored AMMs might lie not just in their financial or technical innovations, but in their capacity to cultivate deeper loyalty and sustainable engagement within niche communities.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Upcoming Events

Brooklyn, NY

SUN - MON, JUN. 22 - 23, 2025

Blockworks and Cracked Labs are teaming up for the third installment of the Permissionless Hackathon, happening June 22–23, 2025 in Brooklyn, NY. This is a 36-hour IRL builder sprint where developers, designers, and creatives ship real projects solving real problems across […]

Industry City | Brooklyn, NY

TUES - THURS, JUNE 24 - 26, 2025

Permissionless IV serves as the definitive gathering for crypto’s technical founders, developers, and builders to come together and create the future.If you’re ready to shape the future of crypto, Permissionless IV is where it happens.

Old Billingsgate

Mon - Wed, October 13 - 15, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Research Report Templates.png

Research

Despite ending its points program, Hyperliquid has maintained a dominant market position with 77% of perpetuals DEX volumes, though overall volume has decreased from early 2025. It is the only DEX that has been able to compete with CEX volumes. Hyperliquid's success stems primarily from rapid, relevant token listings and superior UX for users and market makers, particularly its API - which is how market makers interact with the protocol. The controversial oracle price override during the JELLY incident exposed risks in the Hyperliquid Liquidity Pool (HLP), though the team has since implemented risk management adjustments. The HyperEVM is currently underoptimized and lacks necessary precompiles, but represents an important strategic expansion to enable asset issuance and DeFi composability.

article-image

Securitize announced it acquired a crypto-focused fund administration firm

article-image

ETH’s success hinges on the resource of data availability, particularly how much it sells to L2s

article-image

Solayer’s Emerald Card integrates SolanaID so users can build their “onchain reputation.”

article-image

In 2011, bitcoin blew past the one-dollar event horizon and never looked back

article-image

Sponsored

Transferability of WCT brings the onchain economy closer to a more open, permissionless, and community-driven experience

article-image

Taking a look at the biggest stablecoin players and where they stand