Uniswap Holders Vote on Governance Shakeup To Avoid Bad Ideas

The Uniswap Foundation wants more time for voters to digest governance proposals, while raising the bar for them to pass

article-image

Source: Shutterstock

share

The Uniswap Foundation is hoping to revamp the popular decentralized exchange’s governance process, giving community members more time to discuss and gauge proposals.

As is the case with DAOs, holders of Uniswap’s native token UNI can vote on potential adjustments to the protocol. They can also delegate their tokens to a third party who votes on their behalf.

Currently, proposals must pass three milestones:

  • First, a “temperature check” needs 25,000 UNI ($150,000) in votes across a three-day poll.
  • Then, a “consensus check” needs 50,000 UNI ($300,000) in votes on an iterated proposal across a five-day poll.
  • Thirdly, final proposers must attract 2.5 million UNI ($14.85 million) in delegations, while the actual proposal needs 40 million UNI ($237.6 million) in votes to reach quorum.

The Uniswap Foundation has pitched replacing the first three-day poll with a seven-day “Request for Comment” (RFC) period.

Devin Walsh, executive director of Uniswap Foundation, said in a post that lengthening the first period would allow the community to properly formulate opinions and provide better suggestions.

Another change would rename the second-phase “consensus check” in favor of an amended “temperature check,” which would dramatically raise the quorum threshold from 50,000 UNI ($300,000) to 10 million UNI ($59.4 million). 

The Uniswap Foundation provided this handy governance chart (source).

There are 37 Uniswap delegates who wield more than 2.5 million UNI to vote, Walsh said in the proposal. This means proposers only need to gather support from just two of those delegates to move their proposals along to the final stage. The Uniswap Foundation hopes to change that.

“Increasing quorum to [10 million] UNI increases the effectiveness of this phase as a signal of community support,” Walsh said. An earlier version of the Foundation’s proposal sought a lower limit, at 5 million UNI ($29.7 million).

Walsh believes increasing the minimum quorum can drastically reduce the chances of lower quality proposals moving to the final phase. The final “governance proposal” phase would remain unchanged, including its 40 million UNI quorum threshold.

Uniswap’s native token, which DAO participants must hold to have their say, has lost 65% of its value this year, about the same as bitcoin and ether.

Uniswap Foundation is meant to make governance smoother

Uniswap, which runs on Ethereum, is a cornerstone of the DeFi landscape and the largest decentralized exchange by trade volume.

While its volume has dropped about 80% since the start of the year, it still handles about $900 million per day — more than three times second-place Curve, which is processing around $200 million. For scale, leading centralized exchange Binance currently sees more than $7 billion in trade each day.

DAO members voted to create the Uniswap Foundation in August to reduce governance friction at Uniswap, especially around the creation of high-impact and high-value projects. It was designed to improve ecosystem navigation and provide $60 million in grants to community initiatives over the next few years.

An estimated $1.8 million worth of grants have already been awarded to 14 different projects, spread across three categories: Protocol growth, community growth and governance stewardship.

“One of the Uniswap Foundation’s mandates is to enable better decision making by the DAO, and a pain point has been the community governance process,” Walsh told Blockworks.

Voting for its governance shakeup went live on Snapshot on Wednesday and will last a total of seven days, ending on Dec. 21. At press time, 34 million UNI ($202 million) has been allocated to voting in favor of the Foundation’s proposal, with only 33 UNI ($200) voting against.

“We are pleased that this proposal has received so much feedback from delegates, and are excited for these changes, if approved, to both increase the process’s effectiveness as well as reduce its operational overhead,” Walsh said.

David Canellis contributed reporting.


Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

Explore the growing intersection between crypto, macroeconomics, policy and finance with Ben Strack, Casey Wagner and Felix Jauvin. Subscribe to the Forward Guidance newsletter.

Get alpha directly in your inbox with the 0xResearch newsletter — market highlights, charts, degen trade ideas, governance updates, and more.

The Lightspeed newsletter is all things Solana, in your inbox, every day. Subscribe to daily Solana news from Jack Kubinec and Jeff Albus.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 18 - 20, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

Brooklyn, NY

TUES - THURS, JUNE 24 - 26, 2025

Permissionless IV serves as the definitive gathering for crypto’s technical founders, developers, and builders to come together and create the future.If you’re ready to shape the future of crypto, Permissionless IV is where it happens.

recent research

Research Report Templates.png

Research

An overview of the Base Ecosystem, with a focus on market leaders.

article-image

Although bitcoin hitting $120k by year’s end is looking unlikely

article-image

About 270 million HYPE has been claimed, valued around $7.6 billion

article-image

Stanford professors David Mazières and Dan Boneh will lead the lab alongside a cohort of graduate student researchers

article-image

With more companies holding BTC, bitcoin yielding strategies could become “a new corporate finance norm,” CoinShares posed

article-image

The proposal comes after Polygon governance considered a controversial use of bridged liquidity for yield

article-image

Can the community balance its decentralized ethos with the need for inclusivity and constructive debate?