FTX Arena Is Now Kaseya Center: Where Crypto Sports Sponsorships Are Headed

The future of crypto sports sponsorships may be dependent on trust and regulation

article-image

VictorWard/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks

share

It’s official. The FTX Arena is no more, and the Miami Heat’s stadium now has the namesake of Kaseya, a Miami-based software company. It’s the latest domino to fall in the slowing of crypto sports sponsorships.

Blockworks previously reported in January that crypto companies flooded approximately $515 million into the sports sponsorship market in the first half of 2022, according to GlobalData. In the second half of the year, crypto sponsorship spending slumped to $3 million.

Conrad Wiacek, head of sport analysis and consulting at GlobalData, said he isn’t at all optimistic for the future of crypto dealmaking. 

“We aren’t expecting crypto deals to bounce back anytime soon,” he wrote in an email.

The crypto winter in sports can be traced back to 2021 when staggeringly large sponsorships were being approved. Crypto.com bought naming rights to the Lakers’ stadium, formerly known as Staples Center, in a $700 million deal. FTX also sponsored esports organization TSM for $210 million. 

Emerging industries such as crypto throwing gobs of money at sports franchises is nothing new, according to Joe Favorito, a veteran sports media consultant and professor at Columbia University.

“I think when you see emerging industries, and gambling went through this as well, there’s a rush to use sports as the front porch for reaching consumers,” Favorito said. “The beauty of sports is it’s the only thing that consumers around the world are watching live.”

The once burgeoning tech industry spent like crazy to get their names on stadiums back in the late 1990s as well, only to go through their own devastating growing pains following the dotcom crash.

PSINet and CMGI were both up and coming internet companies at that time. Like FTX did some 20+ years later, they signed huge naming rights deals. PSINet signed a $105 million deal to be featured on Baltimore Ravens’ stadium, and CMGI was prepared to spend $7.6 million a year for 15 years to have its name on the new home stadium of the New England Patriots.

These companies and many others along with them were swallowed up by the dotcom bubble before they could make good on the promises they made to franchises. Tech stocks were able to slowly recover, and now, certain tech companies are once again the face of some of these stadiums.

Favorito believes the path for crypto to get back into sports sponsorships is establishing trust with fans and the leadership of teams alike.

“I think as federal regulation in whatever that looks like comes along you’ll see an interest in this space because people want to know that it’s safe, secure and viable,” Favorito said. “[Crypto] has a chance to come back just like there are plenty of dotcoms that came out of that.”

The Kaseya Center has had four different names since it opened in 1998 — American Airlines Arena, FTX Arena, Miami-Dade Arena and Kaseya Center. And in fact, a few stadiums have changed names many more times. Hard Rock Stadium, the home of the Miami Dolphins, has had nine different names since 1987. We’ll spare you the list. 

Keep reading for some excerpts from Blockworks’ interview with Favorito:

Blockworks: What are your general thoughts on crypto sports sponsorships? Where do you see them now, and where do you see them going?

Favorito: I think the market will dictate where it goes. There was a rush of cash and teams or organizations immediately took the cash and asked less questions because the cash was so high and they wanted to bring in this new sexy category.

While you haven’t seen every crypto-tied, sports deal go away, you have seen some of them go away. You’ll see an ebb and flow with things. I don’t think it’s a totally toxic category at all. I think it’s something that will continue to evolve as the marketplace evolves and as people frankly understand a little bit more.

Blockworks: Do you think sports franchises will still have an appetite for crypto sponsorships going forward simply because of the money that these companies were willing to throw out in 2021 and early 2022?

Favorito: First of all, how many threw out the money and how many actually got paid is still to be determined. If a company goes bankrupt and they’re paying 10 cents on the dollar there’s a lot of untanglement that has to happen for you to make that area of real estate valuable again. You have to go out and resell it again.

Then it also can play out with your consumers. You listen to your fans, and you listen to your audience. Is this something that our core consumers, our followers are going to be okay with? Or is it something that they’re going to give us backlash, like why are you taking this money? This company screwed me over. And that’s something that will take some time to unravel.

This interview was edited for brevity and clarity.


Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

Explore the growing intersection between crypto, macroeconomics, policy and finance with Ben Strack, Casey Wagner and Felix Jauvin. Subscribe to the Forward Guidance newsletter.

Get alpha directly in your inbox with the 0xResearch newsletter — market highlights, charts, degen trade ideas, governance updates, and more.

The Lightspeed newsletter is all things Solana, in your inbox, every day. Subscribe to daily Solana news from Jack Kubinec and Jeff Albus.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 18 - 20, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

Brooklyn, NY

TUES - THURS, JUNE 24 - 26, 2025

Permissionless IV serves as the definitive gathering for crypto’s technical founders, developers, and builders to come together and create the future.If you’re ready to shape the future of crypto, Permissionless IV is where it happens.

recent research

LTIPPanalysis.png

Research

This report is a retroactive analysis of Arbitrum's Long Term Incentives Pilot Program (LTIPP). We collect relevant data at a protocol level and review bi-weekly updates to analyze recipients, their strategies, and the impact of the incentives on high level growth metrics. In particular, we want to highlight outperformers and underperformers, and glean any best practices or lessons learned for protocols distributing ARB incentives in the future. The overarching goal is to synthesize lessons learned that the DAO can reference as it begins thinking about future incentives programs–namely, the working group for incentives that is being actively discussed–especially as Timeboost introduces new conditions for trading and economic activity.

article-image

Sponsored

AI project Zerebro intersects the spheres of artificial intelligence, finance, art, music, and culture

article-image

Allmight is focused on furthering the United States’ leadership in crypto

article-image

The conditions Charles Schwab is waiting for before jumping headfirst into crypto could take shape soon

article-image

The FCA’s director of payments and digital assets shared some takeaways from chats with crypto companies and law firms

article-image

Let’s take a look at how US equities typically perform this time of year and what we might see in the coming days

article-image

Lumina introduces transparency and permissionless integration via an OP stack-based optimium, challenging traditional oracle designs