Janover Inc. set to receive some of Kraken’s staked SOL

Publicly-listed Janover announced last week that a group of ex-Kraken employees had acquired a majority stake in the company

article-image

ddRender/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks

share


This is a segment from the Lightspeed newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe.


Kraken has signed a non-binding letter of intent to delegate some of its current and future staked Solana tokens to validators operated by Janover Inc., the real estate company turned Solana treasury play told Lightspeed exclusively.

Publicly-listed Janover, which intends to change its name to DeFi Development Corporation, announced last week that a group of ex-Kraken employees had acquired a majority stake in the company and raised $42 million via convertible bonds from a group of firms including Kraken.

With this LOI, Kraken appears to be doubling down on its Janover backing — although details on the deal, such as how much Kraken stake Janover will oversee, are still scant. Interestingly, Janover does not yet own a validator operation, so Kraken is essentially pledging its stake to validators Janover intends to operate. 

Janover chief investment officer and chief operating officer Parker White did note that Kraken would receive more Janover stock consideration as part of the deal. 

The new Janover team — which includes Joseph Onorati as CEO alongside White in the C-suite — acquired the company founder’s shares for about $4 million, per SEC filings. It then managed to raise $42 million in debt and has already snapped up around $21 million in Solana.

The Janover debt is converted when the company reaches $100 million in market capitalization, so investors appear to be valuing the company at a far higher level than what the new owners paid to acquire it. JNVR stock is up over 1,700% since right before the company’s new ownership was announced.

The company’s real estate business is still operational, but the value appears to be coming from the treasury. In an interview, Janover executives pitched the company as a sort of better investment vehicle for Solana compared to ETFs — and a spiritual successor to Michael Saylor’s bitcoin treasury strategy. 

“A lot of people said, ‘The [bitcoin] ETFs are going to kill MicroStrategy. Actually the exact opposite happened,’” White said, later adding: “I think in 10, 20 years people are going to look back and be like, ‘Of course the ETF is not the best way to hold digital assets, especially yield bearing digital assets.’”

White argued that potential staked Solana ETFs would not be able to stake their entire balance due to liquidity demands, and ETF issuers cannot run their own validators, so they have to pay extra fees. Janover isn’t the first company to make this bet: Canadian holding company Sol Strategies has also been likened to MicroStrategy on Solana.

Since solana tends to be more volatile than bitcoin, and much of Strategy’s business model revolves around bitcoin volatility, White argued that Janover could play the convertible debt strategy even more successfully. 

Either way, Kraken appears all-in on its former employees’ Solana venture. Onorati was previously chief strategy officer at the exchange. 

“I messaged [Kraken co-founder Jesse Powell] about this, and his first response was something like, ‘Hell yes, where do I send the check?’” Onorati said.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 24 - 26, 2026

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Research Report Templates (27).png

Research

Solana's spot trading landscape will remain bifurcated: prop AMMs will own the short-tail of highly liquid pairs, while passive AMMs continue drifting toward the long-tail. Both can win via vertical integration, but in opposite directions: passive AMMs are moving closer to users through token issuance platforms (e.g., Pump-PumpSwap, MetaDAO-Futarchy AMM), while prop AMMs are moving down the stack into transaction landing services and infrastructure (e.g., HumidiFi-Nozomi). The venues most at risk are legacy AMMs with limited end-user control and no durable, launch-driven source of order flow.

article-image

Some systems improve by failing — and crypto has no choice

article-image

Yield Basis introduces an IL-free AMM design that already dominates BTC DEX liquidity

article-image

Maybe tokenholders don’t need the rights that corporate shareholders have come to expect

article-image

As Hyperliquid and Lighter battle for perps DEX dominance, Boros could capture the structural upside

article-image

Investors are often right about the future, but wrong about the returns

article-image

A look back at 2025, reflections on our industry, and what it means for Blockworks in 2026