Liquity aims to build on safety record with V2 using staked ether

The team behind the decentralized ether-backed stablecoin LUSD hopes to solve the “stablecoin trilemma”


WindAwake/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks


The team behind decentralized stablecoin protocol Liquity lifted the curtain on a long-awaited sequel to its ether-backed LUSD on Monday, this time using staked ether as collateral and a new reserve mechanism.

In the current version, borrowers use ether as collateral to mint LUSD at a 0% interest rate, after a one-time borrowing fee — currently 0.5%. The team made the new version public at EthCC in Paris.

Ever since liquid staked ether gained traction, Liquity community members in the project’s Discord have speculated about a new version of the system to take advantage of staking yields.

LUSD is small by stablecoin standards, with a supply that peaked at $1.5 billion in May 2021, and now sits at under $300 million. That’s partly a result of its design.

Just as there’s a blockchain trilemma, there’s a trilemma specific to stablecoins comprising decentralization, stability and scalability.

LUSD is decentralized — its smart contracts are immutable — and stable, but not scalable because it relies on overcollateralization of ether, currently at 260% of LUSD.

These properties have earned it a “A” safety rating from, a new nonprofit organization dedicated to evaluating stablecoins, according to Garett Jones, co-founder and chief economist.

“We’re basically doing the equivalent of a value at risk assessment,” Jones told Blockworks. “Even in the worst 30-day period that Ethereum has had since inception, [Liquity’s collateralization] would still be sufficient.” And it’s not susceptible to governance attacks that have haunted some stablecoin efforts.

The problem for scaling LUSD is that ether is a productive asset — with demand from staking surging — and locking up 200% percent to borrow a stablecoin is not very capital efficient. But if you could power your borrowing with a yield-generating asset, that’s another story.

The rise of LST-based forks

Until recently, the team has been coy about their plans for a new version.

And it would have to be completely new; like Uniswap, Liquity’s smart contracts cannot be upgraded. But unlike virtually all DeFi protocols, Liquity doesn’t have its own front-end website, preferring to outsource that function to the community. 

The main impediment to a new version is the relative immaturity — and therefore increased risks — of the various flavors of liquid staking tokens (LSTs) that could conceivably be employed.

Maintaining flexibility by launching an upgradeable version of Liquity would run counter to its decentralized ethos.

It has been clear for some time that there was going to be market demand for such a product, however.

By the time of Ethereum’s Shapella upgrade, which enabled withdrawals and significantly de-risked the use of LSTs, the team was well aware that multiple projects were working on a Liquity-like product using Lido’s stETH and other LSTs.

Raft Finance, announced its intention to do so on March 20, and Gravita and Lybra soon followed in April — all forked from Liquity’s open-source code, with none connected to the Liquity team.

Collectively, the upstarts have minted about $243 million in stablecoins, R, GRAI and eUSD on Ethereum, although these have tended to drift more than 1% away from their $1 peg thus far.

The decentralized reserve

One challenge to stablecoin stability is maintaining sufficient liquidity on decentralized and centralized exchanges, said Robert Lauko, Liquity’s founder, in his Paris presentation.

“Normally you would need to pay out a lot of incentives to have liquid secondary markets,” he said. That’s why Liquity intends to use a newer approach to collateral backing, which Lauko calls “a decentralized reserve.”

The design has yet to be finalized, but the basic idea is to combine a delta-neutral hedging mechanism with an attractive leverage product that includes some principal protection to remove the risk of liquidation.

The protocol will both act as its own market maker and insurance fund, while protecting itself from bank runs, Lauko said.

“We are now in a phase where we want to open up our research…we would love to hear your insights, criticisms, reactions about the new project and product and also see whether we can take it to the next level.”

The new protocol — which will likely receive its own brand name — is expected to go live in 2024.

Don’t miss the next big story – join our free daily newsletter.


Upcoming Events

Hilton Metropole | 225 Edgware Rd, London

MON - WED, MARCH 18 - 20, 2024

Crypto’s premier institutional conference returns to London in March 2024. The DAS: London Experience:  Attend expert-led panel discussions and fireside chats  Hear the latest developments regarding the crypto and digital asset regulatory environment directly from policymakers and experts   Grow your network […]

Salt Lake City, UT

WED - FRI, OCTOBER 9 - 11, 2024

Pack your bags, anon — we’re heading west! Join us in the beautiful Salt Lake City for the third installment of Permissionless. Come for the alpha, stay for the fresh air. Permissionless III promises unforgettable panels, killer networking opportunities, and mountains […]

recent research

Frax report cover.jpg


Frax saw continued development in its frxETH liquid staking derivative and Fraxlend money market throughout 2023. Frax V3 introduces an RWA strategy to drive utility to the protocol's cornerstone product, the FRAX stablecoin.


MicroStrategy discloses the purchase of 16,000 bitcoin throughout November


Digital asset firms face potential new regulatory landscape under Treasury’s proposed authority expansion


Uniswap Labs will be providing trading APIs to Talos investors through Fireblocks


DYDX supply will climb by up to 80% after the Friday unlock, but a couple factors make a massive sell-off appear unlikely


Switzerland-based Pando Asset, which has crypto products trading on the SIX Swiss Exchange, now looks to the US


Binance does not hold the required licenses to advertise and serve customers in the Philippines, the country’s securities regulator said