Ordinals deserve a red carpet welcome

No matter what some critics might think, Bitcoin miners should welcome Ordinals with open arms

OPINION
article-image

alphaspirit.it/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks

share

In the past month, the crypto community has been going wild over Ordinals, a protocol that enables users to mint NFT-like assets called inscriptions directly onto Bitcoin. 

With nearly 12 million inscriptions now created on top of the BTC blockchain, the hype around this new tech has led to a surge in demand for computing power. As the latter is required to validate transactions in the Bitcoin network, this sudden increase in demand has significantly raised transaction fees as miners compete for available resources. 

Some experts have spoken out against Ordinals, emphasizing the protocol’s vulnerability to scams and issues with slower speeds. But I maintain that this network overload will likely be transitory, and viable layer-2 protocols will emerge to improve transaction speeds and security. 

I’m strongly in favor of Ordinals, regardless of any temporary issues currently at hand — because I believe they will have a net positive effect on the profitability of BTC mining in the long run, especially considering the upcoming 2024 halving. 

New testing opportunities for Bitcoin applications are an innately worthy trend, adding more meaning to the cryptocurrency in the grand scheme of things.

Raising the stakes for bitcoin mining

As a Bitcoin ideologist, I see why so many users are attracted to Ordinals. It’s safe to say that Bitcoin has one of the most powerful brands in the crypto industry. BTC is still the largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, and Bitcoin has the most extensive history among all blockchains. It’s a big deal that it finally became possible to launch NFT-like assets on the network.

For miners like myself, the rising popularity of Ordinals has been more than welcome news. With Bitcoin’s scalability limited to around seven transactions per second (TPS), a sudden increase in demand for computing power often translates to higher fees. As each halving reduces block rewards (validators’ primary source of revenue) by 50% every four years, this shift in profitability away from rewards is something that should be welcomed by many miners.

Why 2017 has little to do with 2023

For a long time, the 2017 bull market was the last time Bitcoin transaction fees surpassed block rewards for miners. This changed in May 2023, when multiple mining pools mined blocks where fees exceeded the 6.25 BTC block subsidy.

But don’t you worry that 2017 has much in common with the 2023 situation. 

Six years ago, Bitcoin transaction fees were higher than block subsidies due to the overall crypto market hype and massive bull run, which significantly increased demand for regular transfers. Since then, several improvements have been made to the Bitcoin protocol to enhance its TPS capacities, such as SegWit, transaction batching and intra-exchange transactions.

Read more from our opinion section: Decentralization is a zero-sum game

Now, for the second time in history, we see that miners are not fully dependent on block rewards. Most importantly, the current period of high transaction fees changed the perception of the sustainability of bitcoin mining. Practically speaking, I see that transaction fees will most likely become the main source of revenue in the future’s mining industry. And as Bitcoin’s adoption and usability increase, miners are expected to earn more from commissions than via block rewards.

Bitcoin miners learn to adapt 

The hype around Bitcoin Ordinals came with a number of changes, and we, bitcoin miners, will need to adapt to remain profitable. We need to upgrade our mining infrastructure and software and optimize energy efficiency to address the challenge of reduced block rewards.

I expect that more applications will be written on top of the Bitcoin protocol now that Ordinals have paved the way, and we will see more use cases and a greater boost in Bitcoin adoption in the next couple of years. 

Regardless of the concerns raised with how Ordinals as a technology exists now, I still believe that experimenting with the Bitcoin network’s capabilities can only help support the overall ecosystem, both now and in the future.



Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

Explore the growing intersection between crypto, macroeconomics, policy and finance with Ben Strack, Casey Wagner and Felix Jauvin. Subscribe to the Forward Guidance newsletter.

Get alpha directly in your inbox with the 0xResearch newsletter — market highlights, charts, degen trade ideas, governance updates, and more.

The Lightspeed newsletter is all things Solana, in your inbox, every day. Subscribe to daily Solana news from Jack Kubinec and Jeff Albus.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 18 - 20, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

Brooklyn, NY

TUES - THURS, JUNE 24 - 26, 2025

Permissionless IV serves as the definitive gathering for crypto’s technical founders, developers, and builders to come together and create the future.If you’re ready to shape the future of crypto, Permissionless IV is where it happens.

recent research

Research Report Templates.png

Research

An overview of the Base Ecosystem, with a focus on market leaders.

article-image

Although bitcoin hitting $120k by year’s end is looking unlikely

article-image

About 270 million HYPE has been claimed, valued around $7.6 billion

article-image

Stanford professors David Mazières and Dan Boneh will lead the lab alongside a cohort of graduate student researchers

article-image

With more companies holding BTC, bitcoin yielding strategies could become “a new corporate finance norm,” CoinShares posed

article-image

The proposal comes after Polygon governance considered a controversial use of bridged liquidity for yield

article-image

Can the community balance its decentralized ethos with the need for inclusivity and constructive debate?