Bittrex Global not ‘paying a penny’ as its US affiliate set to pay SEC

Exchange’s bankrupt US arm is responsible for the $24 million settlement amount while its foreign affiliate acts only as a “second-line guarantor,” Bittrex Global says

article-image

rafapress/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks

share

Crypto exchange Bittrex last week agreed to pay $24 million to the US Securities and Exchange Commission as part of a settlement related to unregistered securities allegations. 

However, the company’s global business said it is not shelling out any money. The $24 million is to be paid by Bittrex’s US arm, Bittrex Global said in a statement Wednesday. 

“What makes this result so unusual and gratifying is that our client, Bittrex Global, will put this matter behind it without paying a penny in settlement,” added Andrew Michaelson, partner at law firm King & Spalding. “We are thrilled with this result on behalf of our client.” 

Bittrex’s settlement with the SEC was filed on Aug. 10, with the company neither admitting nor denying various alleged securities violations.

The court confirmed the settlement late Tuesday, a company spokesperson told Blockworks in an email. While Bittrex Global will not make any payment, the representative added, it has agreed to be “jointly and severally liable” for the settlement amount as a “second-line guarantor.”

Bittrex’s US arm said in March it would shut down, in part because of the “regulatory uncertainty” in the country. CEO Richie Lai noted at the time that the exchange would look to continue growing Bittrex Global, a separate business regulated in Bermuda and Liechtenstein.

The SEC hit the company with charges the following month, alleging that six tokens available on Bittrex are securities. The regulator charged Bittrex Global, specifically, for “failing to register as a national securities exchange in connection with its operation of a single shared order book along with Bittrex.”

Bittrex US filed for bankruptcy in the weeks after the SEC filed its complaint.

Bittrex Global CEO Oliver Linch noted during an interview with Blockworks in May that Bittrex Global and the US business are “entirely separate companies” — a fact he said he doesn’t think the SEC understands.

“Bittrex Global has made enormous investments to ensure that we do not accept US customers,” Linch said in a Wednesday statement. “We service clients and provide services exclusively outside the US.” 

All Bittrex Global customer funds remain “safe and accessible,” the company said.


Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Salt Lake City, UT

WED - FRI, OCTOBER 9 - 11, 2024

Pack your bags, anon — we’re heading west! Join us in the beautiful Salt Lake City for the third installment of Permissionless. Come for the alpha, stay for the fresh air. Permissionless III promises unforgettable panels, killer networking opportunities, and mountains […]

recent research

Research report - cover graphics (3).jpg

Research

The Across protocol emerges as a dominant bridge within the Ethereum and L2 ecosystem, settling notable volumes with low latency, low fees, and no slippage. Across seeks to expand beyond just bridging as an application, to ultimately become modular, optimistic middleware for settling generalizable cross-chain intents.

article-image

The two brothers were arrested in New York and Boston, and they face two courts later Wednesday

article-image

The fund giant will ultimately offer a bitcoin ETF, Digital Assets Council of Financial Professionals founder says

article-image

Just a few months after it confidentially filed for a US IPO, the company is planning to jump across the pond

article-image

Our nation’s legislative farmers must return to the crucial task of protecting and catalyzing the homegrown crypto ecosystem

article-image

The US government is looking to seriously inhibit people from using and accessing crypto mixing services

article-image

Industry watchers are split on whether a prospective issuer could pursue legal action in the case of a denial