Using Crypto for Crime? Australia Will Give You a Harsher Sentence

In many instances, digital assets were a contributing factor leading to more severe penalties, an RMIT study has found

article-image

Bits And Splits/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks

share

Using crypto to commit a crime in Australia typically results in harsher fines and prison time, an RMIT University study has found.

The study, touted as the first of its kind in the country, reviewed 59 criminal cases and 44 other decisions involving bitcoin (BTC) and digital assets across Australian courts between 2013 and 2022.

Nearly 80% of those cases involved drug offenses, firearms, dealing with proceeds of crime and money laundering. In many instances, crypto was a contributing factor leading to more severe penalties, per an RMIT statement.

Aaron Lane, the study’s lead author and senior lecturer in law at RMIT’s Blockchain Innovation Hub, said the cases generally saw crypto used as a means of payment for illicit goods.

This results in stiffer sentencing compared to those who commit the same crime using fiat currency, Lane added.

“The use of cryptocurrency in the commission of a criminal offense is seen by courts as a factor that indicates sophistication or seriousness of the offense,” Lane said in the statement.

Study co-author and associate lecturer in law at RMIT’s Graduate School of Business and Law, Lisanne Adam, said sentencing judges were keen to send a message to warn potential offenders.

“Cryptocurrency is potentially attractive to criminals because the technology facilitates seamless global transfers without the friction of the traditional banking system – and in a way that can be difficult to identify,” Adam said.

Crypto is not a crime

Chainalysis has found that less than 1% of all on-chain transaction volume was tied to criminal activity. Global crime as a share of all crypto-related activity has also been on a downtrend, per a recent 2023 report.

The US Treasury, which released a review last month, also found that the majority of criminals tend to use government-issued currency, not crypto, to undertake illicit transactions. 

“Money laundering, proliferation financing, and terrorist financing most commonly occur using fiat currency or other traditional assets as opposed to virtual assets,” the Treasury said.

RMIT researchers however pointed to the steady increase in local court cases involving crypto since 2013, from virtually zero to 46 by 2020. 

More consideration from police and prosecutors is needed regarding the complexity and sophistication of the crime, rather than if digital assets were used, they said.

“There is a risk that law enforcement prosecutors characterize cryptocurrency as a marker of sophistication in crime, which is not always the case,” Adam said. Law enforcement needs to effectively determine the level of sophistication in the crime and present a fair case.”


Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

Explore the growing intersection between crypto, macroeconomics, policy and finance with Ben Strack, Casey Wagner and Felix Jauvin. Subscribe to the On the Margin newsletter.

The Lightspeed newsletter is all things Solana, in your inbox, every day. Subscribe to daily Solana news from Jack Kubinec and Jeff Albus.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Salt Lake City, UT

MON - TUES, OCT. 7 - 8, 2023

Blockworks and Bankless in collaboration with buidlbox are excited to announce the second installment of the Permissionless Hackathon – taking place October 7-8 in Salt Lake City, Utah. We’ve partnered with buidlbox to bring together the brightest minds in crypto for […]

Salt Lake City, UT

WED - FRI, OCTOBER 9 - 11, 2024

Pack your bags, anon — we’re heading west! Join us in the beautiful Salt Lake City for the third installment of Permissionless. Come for the alpha, stay for the fresh air. Permissionless III promises unforgettable panels, killer networking opportunities, and mountains […]

recent research

Top Pic.jpeg

Research

Avalanche has introduced proposal ACP-77, which would drastically lower the barrier to entry to launch a dedicated blockchain, while imposing a continuous fee mechanism that subnets would pay to the P-Chain. By performing a scenario analysis of different dedicated blockchain solutions, we conclude that ACP77 would hypothetically make Avalanche subnets as cost-effective as Celestia-based rollups while providing additional liveness guarantees and native interoperability.

article-image

Plus, May’s jobs report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics is going to be a big one

article-image

Plus, it’s time to finally address the Iggy Azalea in the room

article-image

There will be no altcoin season until we get ETFs for all the dog coins

article-image

Bitcoin miner is in discussions with other potential clients as it plans to use another 300 MW of capacity to support high-performance computing

article-image

Plus, Robinhood announced that it entered into an agreement to acquire Bitstamp, one of Europe’s largest and longest-serving crypto exchanges

article-image

Whether you decide to invest in bitcoin should be up to you, not the SEC or Gary Gensler