Stablecoins Will Only Have Value on PoS Ethereum Post-Merge

DeFi applications’ value will follow the stablecoin issuers, while PoW-forked versions will collapse, dooming an independent PoW chain to irrelevance

article-image

Blockworks Exclusive Art by Axel Rangel

share

key takeaways

  • Tether’s CTO Paolo Ardoino confirmed on Twitter that Tether plans to support ETH2
  • “I don’t expect there to be any stablecoins on the PoW chain after the Merge,” Adam Gall, chief technology officer of Decent Labs told Blockworks

As the anticipated Ethereum Merge draws near, conversations around the consequences of an Ethereum hard fork post-merge are bubbling on Twitter. 

Cryptocurrency-focused investment manager Galois Capital claimed that stablecoin providers such as Tether and Circle would remain on Ethereum’s Proof of Work (PoW) network — stating that bugs on the new Proof of Stake (PoS) network could potentially lead to stablecoin liability and lawsuits. 

This misconception was quickly shut down by Tether’s CTO Paolo Ardoino, who wrote on Twitter that “It’s not about what I/we prefer between PoW/PoS. Stablecoins should act responsibly and avoid disruption for users.”

Adding that Tether plans to “support ETH2.”

Adam Gall, chief technology officer of Decent Labs, a Web3 accelerator, told Blockworks that it’s important to note that “a hard fork is going to happen regardless because the Merge is technically just a change to the rules.”

“At points of power structure changes, there will often be people trying to fill voids, and this [Galois Capital] is certainly an example where if enough confusion can be created, it will allow some people to step in and try to hold on or create power.”

Ultimately, Gall said that the power of determining the fork that will survive will be down to stablecoin providers Centre and Tether.

“There is so much value tied up in stablecoins, so they will have a lot of influence over the community in deciding which is the most important chain,” Gall said.

Chaotic consequences for ETHPoW post-merge

DeFi protocols are highly dependent on stablecoin assets. As stablecoins are commonly used as collateral for lending and borrowing, not following the decisions of stablecoin providers could have disastrous consequences for the majority of the popular DeFi protocols available today.

For one simple thought experiment, imagine an ETHPoW fork of money market protocol Aave. As USDC on the fork cannot be redeemed for US dollars, it will become practically worthless. Similarly, all Lido staked ether (stETH) becomes worthless on the PoW fork since its value is derived from a claim on staked ETH on the PoS Ethereum Beacon Chain today.

“On AavePoW that means a [$1.4 billion] hole in the books,” Marc Zeller, Head of Developer relations at Aave noted on Twitter on Monday.

Loading Tweet..

The same thing would happen to all DeFi protocols such as Maker and Uniswap, resulting in a chaotic, cascading mess. All of Ethereum DeFi would have to be rebuilt from scratch.

“DeFiPoW is dead on arrival,” Zeller concluded, adding that NFTs on the ETHPoW fork will suffer a similar fate

Gall agrees. “My assumption is that stablecoin issuers are in support of the Merge and will eventually make declarations of support for the PoS chain over the PoW chain,” Gall said. “I don’t expect there to be any stablecoins on the PoW chain after the Merge.”

Without stablecoins and NFTs, ETHPoW is doomed to the trash bin of blockchain history.
“There is no real chance for profit there,” according to Zeller.

Macauley Peterson contributed reporting for this story.


Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

The Lightspeed newsletter is all things Solana, in your inbox, every day. Subscribe to daily Solana news from Jack Kubinec and Jeff Albus.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Salt Lake City, UT

WED - FRI, OCTOBER 9 - 11, 2024

Pack your bags, anon — we’re heading west! Join us in the beautiful Salt Lake City for the third installment of Permissionless. Come for the alpha, stay for the fresh air. Permissionless III promises unforgettable panels, killer networking opportunities, and mountains […]

recent research

Research report cover graphics (4).jpg

Research

Despite crypto gaming related projects and funds raising close to a billion dollars in November 2021, there have been only a handful of games that have attracted users apart from mercenary capital, and have had sustained activity for longer than a few months. Crypto gaming is going through an infrastructure phase. Theoretically, crypto gaming stands to benefit from purpose-built, high throughput chains, where blockspace is cheap (especially for games which are fully onchain). However, despite the launch of many gaming-focused chains, most crypto games are lacking in quality and quantity. Most new crypto gaming infrastructure either have no games or only a few games launched (e.g. Xai) or have failed to garner meaningful attention (e.g. Immutable X).

article-image

Uniswap Labs said it’s ready to fight back if the SEC takes the crypto firm to court

article-image

WisdomTree has gotten FCA approval to list bitcoin and ether ETPs on the London Stock Exchange, the company said Wednesday

article-image

It’s ups and downs for Solana’s DEXs, with top players continuing to show diverse performances

article-image

The Trump campaign announced that people can make crypto donations in support of the former president

article-image

In a 43-page submission published Tuesday, Uniswap made its case to the SEC on why the regulator should not take legal action against them

article-image

Fidelity, Ark Invest and Grayscale have so far adjusted proposals to omit plans of staking the funds’ ETH holdings