Galaxy Adds to Stack of Bitcoin Futures ETF Filings

Firm files for bitcoin futures ETF despite Michael Novogratz saying SEC favoring these products is “a mistake”

article-image

Galaxy Digital CEO Mike Novogratz; Source: Brandon Shamy, ONE37pm

share
  • Filing resembles recent filings by Invesco, ProShares and VanEck as issuers seek easiest SEC approval path
  • Costs associated with bitcoin futures ETFs could constrain investor demand, Bloomberg Intelligence analysts argue

Galaxy Digital has jumped aboard the bandwagon of issuers hoping to bring to market a bitcoin futures ETF amid industry pessimism around the SEC approving a physical bitcoin ETF anytime soon. 

The proposed Galaxy Bitcoin Strategy ETF seeks to provide actively managed exposure to bitcoin futures contracts, according to a disclosure filed with the SEC on Tuesday. The document does not indicate a ticker or expense ratio for the planned offering. 

The fund may also invest in Canadian ETFs or other pooled investment vehicles, but will not invest directly in bitcoin, the preliminary prospectus states. Galaxy Digital Asset Management subadvises CI Global Asset Management’s bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, which are currently listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange. 

A Galaxy spokesperson declined to comment further on the filing.

The proposal follows similar ones by Invesco and ProShares, as well as VanEck, which was the first to file for a bitcoin futures ETF in 2017 but later withdrew its application. Gabor Gurbacs, director of VanEck’s digital assets strategy, previously said that the futures markets have significantly matured in the last few years.

The plans come after SEC Chairman Gary Gensler said earlier this month that his agency would “look forward” to reviewing ETF filings that are limited to bitcoin futures contracts traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. About a dozen proposed ETFs that would invest directly in crypto assets await greenlighting from the agency. 

Galaxy CEO Michael Novogratz said during the company’s second quarter earnings call on Monday that he was surprised by Gensler signaling a preference for futures-based ETFs.

“I think it’s a mistake, though every single person in the ETF game is going to try to figure out what the SEC will allow and have a product that fits that need,” he said. “…It doesn’t mean a futures ETF is a bad product — it’s just these are monthly futures so there’s a monthly futures roll every time. I don’t think it’s the best way to set this up.”

The downside

As more firms file for bitcoin futures ETFs in the wake of Gensler’s comments, industry watchers have expressed downsides to such products. 

Bloomberg Intelligence ETF analysts Eric Balchunas and James Seyffart wrote in a research note on Tuesday that they believe the SEC should approve physically backed bitcoin ETFs to avoid futures-related costs.

An ETF that tracks futures must constantly buy and sell them to maintain exposure, the analysts explained, noting that bitcoin’s roll costs have averaged about 10 percentage points of return annually.

“The dilemma for ETF issuers when making bitcoin futures ETFs will be whether to use the front two months, which track closest to bitcoin’s spot price in the near term but cause long-term corrosion and cost,” Balchunas and Seyffart wrote. “Investing in the whole curve would limit roll costs, but the ETF would lose some sensitivity to short-term moves in spot Bitcoin.”

Lara Crigger, managing editor of ETF Trends, previously told Blockworks that other drawbacks to using futures include contango – a situation where the futures price of a commodity is higher than the spot price – as well as position limits, tax differences and changes in the risk-return profile.

In terms of demand, investors have shown they prefer physically backed commodity ETFs over ones that hold futures, Balchunas and Seyffart added. The SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) and the iShares Gold Trust (IAU) have a combined $90 billion in assets, while the futures-backed Invesco DB Gold Fund (DGL) holds just $83 million.

Want more investor-focused content on digital assets? Join us September 13th and 14th for the Digital Asset Summit (DAS) in NYC. Use code ARTICLE for $75 off your ticket. Buy it now.

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Old Billingsgate

Mon - Wed, October 13 - 15, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Flashnote Template (41).png

Research

We believe that few tokens at the application layer are diverging more from fundamentals than ZORA. Its fully-diluted P/S sits at 90x, pricing significant growth despite a consistent decline in weekly revenues since late July. We foresee an 80% decrease in protocol net margins due to a recent update to the fee structure that reduces trading fees from 3% to 1%, while boosting creators’ portion of the fee split. ZORA’s supply overhang also represents a near-term headwind, with 45% of ZORA’s supply (4.5B tokens or $350M at current prices) earmarked for the team & investors beginning to unlock on October 23, 2025 (36-month linear vesting schedule).

article-image

Insiders have the best information — markets should be willing to pay for it

article-image

The CFTC-regulated exchange is opening doors to crypto builders and traders through grants, partnerships, and new deposit options

by Blockworks /
article-image

DFS tells banking organizations to integrate blockchain monitoring tools to curb money laundering and sanctions risks

by Blockworks /
article-image

New short and long-term priorities include L1 gas boosts, ZK-EVMs, privacy reads, and a lean, quantum-resistant Ethereum

by Blockworks /
article-image

The new stBTC token redistributes Bitcoin gas fees to users, creating liquid yield without inflation or lockups

by Blockworks /
article-image

The reserve will collect protocol revenues to back W token, alongside new yield and unlock schedule

by Blockworks /