Securities lawsuit against Compound founders, investors to proceed

The court found that the plaintiffs had “plausibly alleged” that Compound Labs and its associated entities solicited the public to purchase COMP tokens


Compound founder Robert Leshner at Permissionless II; Source: Blockworks


A federal judge in California denied a motion on Thursday to dismiss a case against key figures in Compound Labs and its associated entities, following allegations they violated financial regulations by selling unregistered securities in the form of COMP governance tokens.

Plaintiffs in the case, initially filed 13 months ago, argue those in control of Compound effectively acted as unregistered “sellers” of securities under their soliciting role.

“They assert one cause of action against a range of defendants for violation of sections 5 and 12(a) of the Securities Act of 1933,” according to a court filing in the US District Court of Northern California on Tuesday. 

They’re also unhappy with the price of the tokens, which have since fallen significantly from a peak in May 2021, when it reached more than $850. COMP is currently trading at a little over $38, down more than 95% from its all-time high.

The individual defendants include Compound Labs’ co-founders Robert Leshner and Geoffrey Hayes. Associated entities include Bain Capital Ventures, Polychain Academy, AH Capital Management, Paradigm Operations and Gauntlet Networks.

Collectively, these entities allegedly control a significant portion of the COMP token voting power, per the filing. It’s alleged fewer than ten people control over 50% of COMP tokens and, therefore, have significant influence over the protocol’s governance.

Blockworks reached out to Leshner and Compound representatives but has yet to receive a response.

Compound was initially created by Hayes and Leshner in 2017 with its Mainnet launching a year later. The protocol allows users to lend and borrow crypto, relying on smart contracts to handle operations.

Each COMP token holder can suggest and vote on modifications to the protocol, including the way its reserves and treasury are managed. A single COMP token equates to one vote, purportedly allowing for democratic decision-making. 

If a token holder chooses not to participate in voting personally, they can assign their voting rights to another holder wanting to be actively involved.

The court found that the plaintiffs had “plausibly alleged” that each defendant solicited the public to purchase COMP tokens, thereby denying the motion to dismiss the case. A case management conference is scheduled for Oct. 10.

Don’t miss the next big story – join our free daily newsletter.


Upcoming Events

Salt Lake City, UT

WED - FRI, OCTOBER 9 - 11, 2024

Pack your bags, anon — we’re heading west! Join us in the beautiful Salt Lake City for the third installment of Permissionless. Come for the alpha, stay for the fresh air. Permissionless III promises unforgettable panels, killer networking opportunities, and mountains […]

recent research

ao cover.jpg


Arweave recently launched the testnet for AO computer, a new messaging protocol that will sit atop a PoS network and aims to become a scalable global compute platform through parallel processing and modularity.


The “fastest-growing ETF in history” has seen net inflows on every trading day since its Jan. 11 launch


Relm and Chainproof will provide insurance quotes to distributed validators


DLC.Link uses a Taproot-based Bitcoin multisig to let institutions mint dlcBTC, starting on Arbitrum


Pre-seed Bitcoin startup deals rose 360% in 2023, a TVP report shows


Circle’s new smart contract to allow holders of BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund to redeem shares for its stablecoin


Uniswap says it was not surprised to receive a Wells notice given the SEC’s “abusive” use of power as of late