South Korean Regulator: NFTs Are Not Virtual Assets

South Korean FSC declines to regulate NFT market, citing Financial Action Task Force (FATF) guidance.

article-image

Seoul, S. Korea; Source: Shutterstock

share

key takeaways

  • South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) confirmed that NFTs would not be regulated in-country, citing guidance from FATF
  • Talent agency behind South Korean K-Pop powerhouse BTS makes a strategic investment in Korean digital asset company Dunamu to bootstrap an NFT market

South Korean media is reporting that the country’s financial regulator, the FSC, has declined to regulate NFTs as they do not fall under the definition of “virtual asset” provided by FATF. 

Citing unnamed government officials at the FSC, the Korean Herald reported that as FATF guidance says that NFTs are “digital assets that are unique, rather than interchangeable, and that are in practice used as collectibles rather than as payment or investment instruments,” it’s out of their regulatory remit. 

This doesn’t mean that the burgeoning industry would be unregulated forever. There still is the option on the table for NFTs to be regulated as securities, though that would be via a different regulator, the Financial Supervisory Service. Korea’s The Herald cites an expert expressing concern about price manipulation in the market, and the need to create a form of supervisory framework specifically for NFTs.

In addition, NFTs that function as “security tokens”, such as providing the holder with royalties, would be considered a regulated entity. 

“Some NFTs that on their face do not appear to constitute virtual assets may fall under the VA definition if they are to be used for payment or investment purposes in practice,” reads the guidance published on October 28. “Other NFTs are digital representations of other financial assets already covered by the FATF Standards. Such assets are therefore excluded from the FATF definition of VA, but would be covered by the FATF Standards as that type of financial asset.”

“We are weighing whether NFTs fall into the virtual-asset category because there is a demand to include NFTs among virtual assets,” the country’s finance minister is quoted as saying. 

At the same time, South Korea’s entertainment industry is making its first foray into NFTs. Hybe, the agency behind the boy band sensation BTS, announced late Thursday that it is making a strategic investment into Dunamu, parent of the Korean exchange Upbit, taking a 2.5% stake in the company for approximately $500 million, with Dunamu taking a 5% stake in Hybe for $590 million. 

The two plan to launch an NFT marketplace for fan collectibles in the near future using Hybe’s vast IP library and talent roster.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 18 - 20, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

Brooklyn, NY

TUES - THURS, JUNE 24 - 26, 2025

Permissionless IV serves as the definitive gathering for crypto’s technical founders, developers, and builders to come together and create the future.If you’re ready to shape the future of crypto, Permissionless IV is where it happens.

recent research

Research Report Templates.png

Research

An overview of the Base Ecosystem, with a focus on market leaders.

article-image

Although bitcoin hitting $120k by year’s end is looking unlikely

article-image

About 270 million HYPE has been claimed, valued around $7.6 billion

article-image

Stanford professors David Mazières and Dan Boneh will lead the lab alongside a cohort of graduate student researchers

article-image

With more companies holding BTC, bitcoin yielding strategies could become “a new corporate finance norm,” CoinShares posed

article-image

The proposal comes after Polygon governance considered a controversial use of bridged liquidity for yield

article-image

Can the community balance its decentralized ethos with the need for inclusivity and constructive debate?