BlackRock, then Bitwise — How the spot bitcoin ETF filings differ

BlackRock’s listing exchange would enter into a surveillance-sharing agreement with a US bitcoin spot trading platform operator


Tada Images/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks


One day after BlackRock made a splash last week by putting forward a plan to launch a spot bitcoin ETF, crypto-focused asset manager Bitwise re-upped its own similar bid.

The filings are the latest of their kind in a decade-long saga as the SEC has never allowed a spot bitcoin ETF to hit the US market — despite efforts from the Winklevoss twins, Fidelity and a slew of other would-be issuers. 

But the latest proposed products by BlackRock and Bitwise are a bit different from one another.

Bitwise filed for a spot bitcoin ETF in October 2021 — a proposal ultimately rejected by the SEC in June 2022. 

The Friday filing by NYSE Arca — the would-be listing exchange for the Bitwise product — added more legal analysis around the surveillance of bitcoin via the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) futures markets, according to Bryan Armour, director of passive strategies research at Morningstar.

“The timing of the filing seems likely to jump in the queue behind BlackRock should the SEC approve the first spot Bitcoin ETF,” Armour told Blockworks. 

Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan told Blockworks in April that while a spot bitcoin ETF would be “wonderful” for investors in the long term, the firm would likely wait for more regulatory clarity before pursuing another.   

A Bitwise spokesperson on Tuesday confirmed the firm’s bid but declined to comment.  

Sumit Roy, a senior analyst at, said Bitwise’s move is “pretty clearly a direct response to the BlackRock filing.”   

BlackRock takes new step

“Bitwise has emphasized in the past the idea that prices for bitcoin futures on the CME lead spot bitcoin prices, and therefore, having a surveillance-sharing agreement with the CME should satisfy the SEC’s requirements,” Roy said. “It did so again in this filing but with even more data to back up its case.”

Both the Nasdaq and NYSE filings — related to the BlackRock and Bitwise proposals, respectively — cite the SEC’s approval of a bitcoin futures fund by firm Teucrium. 

That ruling noted that the CME “comprehensively surveils futures market conditions and price movements on a real time and ongoing basis in order to detect and prevent price distortions, including price distortions caused by manipulative efforts.”

Read more: SEC ruling on Teucrium’s bitcoin futures ETF could impact spot funds

In BlackRock’s case, the listing exchange is willing to enter into a surveillance-sharing agreement with “an operator of a US-based spot trading platform for bitcoin,” the document states.

This would supplement its surveillance-sharing agreement with the CME.

“Is that enough to get this ETF over the finish line?” Roy said. “Ordinarily, I would argue no, especially since the spot trading platform in question — if it’s Coinbase — is being sued by the SEC for operating as an unregistered exchange. 

“But because BlackRock is involved, there is hope that they have the inside scoop and will get this done,” he said. “Throw in the impending Grayscale verdict and things are getting pretty complicated.”

A decision in Grayscale Investments’ case against the SEC — launched after the regulator blocked the company’s proposed conversion of its bitcoin trust (GBTC) to an ETF — is expected in the coming months.

Read more: Grayscale win over SEC might not change much, industry watchers say

In the wake of the BlackRock and Bitwise filings, GBTC is up 30% in the last five days, and up roughly 14% on the day. 

Industry watchers say they expect more to re-join the spot bitcoin ETF race. Though eyes have been on Fidelity — another TradFi giant that previously sought to launch a spot bitcoin ETF — the fund titan has not yet re-filed for such a fund.

A Fidelity spokesperson declined to comment. 

Ark Invest and 21Shares re-filed for their spot bitcoin ETF in April. Other hopeful issuers such as VanEck, Valkyrie, WisdomTree, Global X and Invesco could do the same, Bloomberg Intelligence analysts said last week.   

“There tend to be clusters of filings as issuers take a new approach or see increasing odds of acceptance by the SEC,” Armour said. “It’s critical to be among the initial ETFs on the market, so I would be surprised if more didn’t follow suit.”

Don’t miss the next big story – join our free daily newsletter.


Upcoming Events

Hilton Metropole | 225 Edgware Rd, London

Mon - Wed, March 18 - 20, 2024

Crypto’s premier institutional conference returns to London in March 2024. The DAS: London Experience: Attend expert-led panel discussions and fireside chats Hear the latest developments regarding the crypto and digital asset regulatory environment directly from policymakers and experts.

Salt Lake City, UT

WED - FRI, OCTOBER 9 - 11, 2024

Pack your bags, anon — we’re heading west! Join us in the beautiful Salt Lake City for the third installment of Permissionless. Come for the alpha, stay for the fresh air. Permissionless III promises unforgettable panels, killer networking opportunities, and mountains […]

recent research

Top Icon.png


Osmosis thrived in H2 2023 on the back of increased DeFi activity deriving from recently launched Cosmos-related projects and better market conditions. With new value accrual mechanisms for the native token, Osmosis is well-positioned to continue its strong performance in 2024.



Uniswap aims to become a “complete platform for swapping” following its latest product releases


Continued demand for bitcoin ETFs coupled with greater demand for bitcoin from exchanges is contributing to price moves, analysts say


Morpho Blue is designed in a way where risk management is externalized, Morpho Labs’ CEO said


Snowflake, a cloud-based data warehouse solution, has partnered with Dune to make curated blockchain data available to its clients


Crypto is fast and it’s only getting faster as bitcoin threatens to retest its own highs set more than two years ago


The settlement ends the legal battle over, a domain once owned by imprisoned developer Virgil Griffith